2013
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-6-1609-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing the representation of subgrid land surface characteristics in land surface models

Abstract: Abstract. Land surface heterogeneity has long been recognized as important to represent in the land surface models. In most existing land surface models, the spatial variability of surface cover is represented as subgrid composition of multiple surface cover types, although subgrid topography also has major controls on surface processes. In this study, we developed a new subgrid classification method (SGC) that accounts for variability of both topography and vegetation cover. Each model grid cell was represent… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Land surface components of Earth system models are central in representing the interactions between terrestrial biosphere and the atmosphere [Fisher et al, 2014b;Davison et al, 2016]. Realistic representation of land surface heterogeneity is fundamental for predicting key land processes such as GPP and RE [Ke et al, 2013]. Particularly, subgrid heterogeneity in vegetation and topography can significantly influence the estimates of energy and mass fluxes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land surface components of Earth system models are central in representing the interactions between terrestrial biosphere and the atmosphere [Fisher et al, 2014b;Davison et al, 2016]. Realistic representation of land surface heterogeneity is fundamental for predicting key land processes such as GPP and RE [Ke et al, 2013]. Particularly, subgrid heterogeneity in vegetation and topography can significantly influence the estimates of energy and mass fluxes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulations of high spatial resolution can be used for climate impact assessments, as they can better resolve physical processes of regional, mesoscale and local scale circulation effects (surface fluxes, breezes, convection and heavy precipitation) [26]. In addition, such high spatial resolution simulations are imperative when the topography of the region is rather complex with mountainous features and rough coastlines, because of the improved representation of surface characteristics and their spatial variability [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate modelling of such systems must therefore determine whether the SG processes variability is relevant for the given context. If it is, some of the impact of this SG variability may be captured in a parameterized form (Seth et al, 1994;Leung and Ghan, 1995;Marshall and Clarke, 1999;Giorgi et al, 2003;Ke et al, 2013). For ex-ample, to improve surface mass balance in continental-scale ice sheet models, Marshall and Clarke (1999) used hypsometric curves, which represent the cumulative distribution function of the surface elevation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CG ice thickness updating accounts for SG ice thickness, and the SG model accounts for ice flux out of the CG cell. For the first time, we evaluate the accuracy of the SG model against high resolution simulations by a higher order ice sheet model (ISSM; Larour et al, 2012). Sensitivities to the SG model configuration, such as the number of hypsometric bins, are assessed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%