Enriching evaluation practice through care ethics

Abstract

Recently, several authors have called for a critical assessment of the normative dimensions of evaluation practice. This article responds to this call by demonstrating how evaluation practice can be enriched through deliberate engagement with care ethics. Care ethics has a relational and practice view of morality and places caring relationships and responsibilities at the forefront of our being in the world. We will demonstrate how care ethics, in particular Joan Tronto’s moral-political theory of democratic caring, can help evaluators to reshape our way of working by placing caring and relationality at the centre of our evaluative work. Care ethics as a normative orientation for evaluation stretches beyond professional codes of conduct, and rule- or principled-based behaviour. It is part of everything we do or not do, how we interact with others, and what kinds of relationships we forge in our practice. This is illustrated with two examples: a democratic evaluation of a programme for refugee children in Sweden; and a responsive evaluation of a programme for neighbours of people with an intellectual disability in The Netherlands. Both examples show that a caring ethos offers a promising pathway to address the larger political, public issues of our times through the interrogation of un-caring practices. We conclude a caring ethos can help evaluators to strengthen a caring society that builds on people’s deeply felt need to care, to relate, and to connect within and across communities.

Professionals harnessing experiential knowledge in Dutch mental health settings

“…A participatory action research approach (Abma et al, 2019) was used to contribute to the implementation of experiential knowledge in the practice of psychiatry by an action-reflection-learning cycle. Responsive evaluation is a particular version of participatory action approach; one that values the multiple perspectives of stakeholders and dialogue to come to mutual understanding (Abma et al, 2016;Abma et al, 2020). In this participatory study, we worked with professionals from all three MH organizations who were invited to explore the professionalization of experiential knowledge and took part in the project as "co-researchers".…”

An intersectional analysis of diverse professional perspectives on collaborating with caregivers: Empirical Research - Qualitative

“…Asking enabling questions and applying sensitive listening skills are essential to work as partners in diverse care networks. Instead of de ning oneself as all-knowing and superior to the Other, professionals need to rede ne their identity to develop a more caring and fruitful relationship with informal caregivers (Abma et al, 2020). The Self-Other binary can only be deconstructed by reframing the identity of the professional and the relationship as being deeply interdependent and interconnected.…”

Tinkering as Collective Practice: A Qualitative Study on Handling Ethical Tensions in Supporting People with Intellectual or Psychiatric Disabilities

“…Moreover, for clients to voice an opinion of 'good care' in a group of professionals and be an equal partner in deliberating the different values might be quite demanding for clients with ID or SMIand for professionals too (Saario et al 2018). The challenge is to create space and means for negotiating different goods where such epistemic injustice is alleviated (Tronto 2010;Abma et al 2020). There have been calls to create deliberative spaces in which all involved in care, including professionals, clients, family members and managers negotiate complexities related to values together (Visse, Abma, and Widdershoven 2015;Janssens et al 2015).…”