1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02467494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensuring both normality and homocedasticity of chromatographic data-ratios for internal-standard least-squares calibration

Abstract: Because the quotient of two normal variables does not fit a normal distribution and tends to be heterocedastic, the use of internal-standard least-squares regression on data obtained from such ratios gives a calibration function which can result in inaccurate determination of the concentration of analyte in a sample. In this work we have studied simulated situations in which area-ratios are fitted to a normal distribution. It is shown that the least-squares model is inappropriate when the ordinate data-ratios … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38 For homoscedasticity, the results from the calibration curve were submitted to a Cochran's test to verify that random errors in the instrumental signal measurements are constant and independent of the predicted value. 41 The limit of quantification (LOQ) was determined from the lowest concentration of the working range (3.0 ng g -1 ). The chromatograms of samples that produced a signal-to-noise ratio equal to ten were considered as the LOQ.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 For homoscedasticity, the results from the calibration curve were submitted to a Cochran's test to verify that random errors in the instrumental signal measurements are constant and independent of the predicted value. 41 The limit of quantification (LOQ) was determined from the lowest concentration of the working range (3.0 ng g -1 ). The chromatograms of samples that produced a signal-to-noise ratio equal to ten were considered as the LOQ.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%