2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-30793-6_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entity Enabled Relation Linking

Abstract: General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relation linking has been important for various NLP tasks such as semantic parsing, knowledge graph induction (Gardent et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2021;Rossiello et al, 2022;Lin et al, 2020) and knowledge base question answering (Rossiello et al, 2021;Kapanipathi et al, 2020;Neelam et al, 2022). Prior to the surge of generative models, relation linking was addressed either by graph traversal based (Pan et al, 2019;Dubey et al, 2018) or by linguistic-features based methodologies (Sakor et al, 2019a,b;Lin et al, 2020). Several learning based approaches to relation linking have been proposed (Mihindukulasooriya et al, 2020;Yu et al, 2017;Bornea et al, 2021).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relation linking has been important for various NLP tasks such as semantic parsing, knowledge graph induction (Gardent et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2021;Rossiello et al, 2022;Lin et al, 2020) and knowledge base question answering (Rossiello et al, 2021;Kapanipathi et al, 2020;Neelam et al, 2022). Prior to the surge of generative models, relation linking was addressed either by graph traversal based (Pan et al, 2019;Dubey et al, 2018) or by linguistic-features based methodologies (Sakor et al, 2019a,b;Lin et al, 2020). Several learning based approaches to relation linking have been proposed (Mihindukulasooriya et al, 2020;Yu et al, 2017;Bornea et al, 2021).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1. Entity type knowledge plays a key role in various natural language processing related tasks, such as entity and relation linking (Gupta et al, 2017;Pan et al, 2019), knowledge graph completion (Peng et al, 2022;Niu et al, 2022;Wiharja et al, 2020) answering (Hu et al, 2022b;Chen et al, 2019;Hu et al, 2023), and relation extraction . However, one cannot always have access to this kind of knowledge as KGs are inevitably incomplete (Zhu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A knowledge graph (KG) (Pan et al, 2016) is a multi-relational graph encoding factual knowledge, with the form (h, r, t) where h, t are the head and tail entities connected via the relation r. In this paper, we consider KGs with minimal schema information, i.e., those containing entity type assertions, as the only schema information, of the form (e, has_type, c) stating that the entity e has type c; e.g., to capture that Barack Obama has type President. Entity type knowledge is widely used in NLP tasks, e.g., in relation extraction (Liu et al, 2014), entity and relation linking (Gupta et al, 2017;Pan et al, 2019), question answering (ElSahar et al, 2018;Hu et al, 2022), and finegrained entity typing on text (Onoe et al, 2021;Qian et al, 2021;. However, entity types are far from complete, since in real-world applications they are continuously emerging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%