2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.01.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entrainment by a palatable meal induces food-anticipatory activity and c-Fos expression in reward-related areas of the brain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
94
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
7
94
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…LAcbSh neurons seem to be exclusively activated after four HFD consumption events, while MAcbSh neurons are similarly activated after one or four HFD consumption events. The Acb activation presumably occurs as a consequence of the VTA dopamine neurons activation, since food rewards trigger phasic Acb dopamine release that, in turn, increases c-Fos (Day et al, 2007;Mendoza et al, 2005;Park and Carr, 1998). Current results suggest that consummatory rather than anticipatory aspects of feeding are associated with the activation of the mesolimbic pathway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…LAcbSh neurons seem to be exclusively activated after four HFD consumption events, while MAcbSh neurons are similarly activated after one or four HFD consumption events. The Acb activation presumably occurs as a consequence of the VTA dopamine neurons activation, since food rewards trigger phasic Acb dopamine release that, in turn, increases c-Fos (Day et al, 2007;Mendoza et al, 2005;Park and Carr, 1998). Current results suggest that consummatory rather than anticipatory aspects of feeding are associated with the activation of the mesolimbic pathway.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Using circadian time as a cue predicting food availability as it occurs in scheduled feeding paradigms, ghrelin- and GHSRknockout animals exhibited blunted feeding responses, even though they had no impairment in normal feeding or rebound feeding after an acute 24-hour fast. In light of the facts that repeated fasting is associated with increased activity both in cells in hypothalamic centers regulating energy balance and in cells in target regions of the VTA and that ghrelin stimulates DA release in these same regions, it is possible that the lack of ghrelin or GHSRs leads to impairments in mechanisms related to food anticipation (29,30,44). On the other hand, rebound feeding after an acute fast was not altered in adult GHSR-knockout mice, but was decreased in normal adult mice infused with a GHSR antagonist into the VTA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a substantial amount of evidence supporting the notion that cues predicting access to rewards such as food are as effective in activating the mesolimbic reward system as the rewards themselves (15,16,28). Temporal cues that predict food availability are of particular interest because they seem to activate reward circuits and to generate behavioral food-anticipatory responses like increased locomotor activity that could be associated with increased activity of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system (29,30). Because of this, and to further examine whether ghrelin has any physiologic effect on food intake, we analyzed ghrelin-knockout and GHSR-knockout animals on a restricted feeding schedule ( Figure 5, G and H).…”
Section: Peripheral Ghrelin-induced Feeding Responses In Rats Are Attmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 As the anticipation of daily feeding in food-restricted rats can reduce behavioral motivation in instrumental tasks and shift circadian rhythms, the rats were fed no less than 2 hours after the last rats finished behavioral testing (~8 PM). It has been shown that the body temperature and behavioral activity of food-restricted rats increases approximately 1 hour before the daily consumption of rat chow 35,36 and before regular feedings of midday sucrose solution (~20 kcal) presented 8 hours before daily feeding. 37 Although the current behavioral task provided smaller quantities of sucrose (~11 kcal) at less regular intervals (5 days weekly), it is possible that the rats' waking schedule was similarly shifted before testing and that they were sleep deprived for as little as 3, 6, and 9 hours from their actual sleeping times.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%