2015
DOI: 10.17666/308861-82/2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entre cooperação e centralização: Federalismo e políticas sociais no Brasil Pós-1988

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
13

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…As studies of the redemocratization process in Brazil show 3,15,19,20 , hopes were pinned on the capacity of public policy and the SUS as a paradigm to redistribute resources and tackle health inequalities.…”
Section: The Relationship Between a Centralized Federal Government Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As studies of the redemocratization process in Brazil show 3,15,19,20 , hopes were pinned on the capacity of public policy and the SUS as a paradigm to redistribute resources and tackle health inequalities.…”
Section: The Relationship Between a Centralized Federal Government Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, inequality between municipalities is greater than that between the country's major regions 15 . There is an evident need for im-proved central coordination to strengthen local and regional cooperation in favor of greater intergovernmental sharing 20 .…”
Section: The Relationship Between a Centralized Federal Government Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, presidents have powerful institutional prerogatives, such as issuing executive orders (called medidas provisórias), which give them an opportunity to initiate legislation in a broad variety of issues and is particularly important resource for changing the status quo to a new equilibrium acceptable to other political actors and closer to presidential preferences (Figueiredo and Limongi, 2007). They also can decide discretionarily how to allocate public expenditures and how public policy formulation is centralized in the federal government (Arretche, 2009;Abrucio and Costa, 1999;Machado and Palotti, 2015).…”
Section: Coalition Presidentialism In Brazilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is argued that this continuity contributed to the stability of the political dynamics of the process of setting the waste policy in the municipal plan. Thus, the municipal protagonism in the context of the setting of the national waste policy is noteworthy, in the perspective of a type of Brazilian federalism where the federal plan has historically assumed responsibility for the federative coordination of various social policies PALOTTI, 2015;ARRETCHE, 2012;MACHADO, 2014;FONSECA, 2011;SOUZA, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%