2015
DOI: 10.3917/rtm.224.0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entre opposition et participation, les syndicats face aux réformes en Afrique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As elsewhere, the existing scholarship on trade unions in Africa has long focused on their role in social and political emancipation movements. Distancing themselves from this tradition, Geenen and McNamara sought inspiration from ethnographies investigating the ordinary work of trade unionists and the dilemmas they face in dealing with employers and workers (Lubeck 1986;Werbner 2014;Botiveau 2017;Lazar 2017; see Rubbers and Roy 2017). Building on this body of literature, they paid special attention to everyday union activities in the workplace, the internal functioning of union organisations, and the competition between unions in the mining sector.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As elsewhere, the existing scholarship on trade unions in Africa has long focused on their role in social and political emancipation movements. Distancing themselves from this tradition, Geenen and McNamara sought inspiration from ethnographies investigating the ordinary work of trade unionists and the dilemmas they face in dealing with employers and workers (Lubeck 1986;Werbner 2014;Botiveau 2017;Lazar 2017; see Rubbers and Roy 2017). Building on this body of literature, they paid special attention to everyday union activities in the workplace, the internal functioning of union organisations, and the competition between unions in the mining sector.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two case studies also highlight the role that political leaders can play in labour disputes, and the special place that is given to Chinese firms in the political arena. By shedding light on the constraints faced by trade unionists in the workplace, and by replacing their ambiguous role in the historical trajectories of trade unionism in both countries, the chapters together provide a nuanced and comprehensive analysis of their actions that contrasts with the more militant approach usually found in the literature (see Rubbers and Roy 2017;McNamara and Spyridakis 2020).…”
Section: Structure Of the Bookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last stage, from 1990 to 2002, the reinstatement of a multi-party system led to the permission of trade unionism (Botedi 2013: 38). But ironically, although a number of large trade unions emerged, they were less able to protect worker rights than in the 1990s (Rubbers and Roy 2015) as L. D. Kabila was a ferocious oppressor of trade unionists (Botedi 2013).…”
Section: Unionism In Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our papers, we attempt to reconcile this disjuncture, exploring union activities in the workplace and linking these to organizing strategies and to the homes and communities that workers create. Rubbers and Roy (2015) describe the analytic confusion surrounding the label 'union'. Authors assume that all workers, along with union managements, and even business syndicates share common meanings of unionism, and in doing so overlook how unionism is imaged and organized in different places at different times.…”
Section: Anthropologies Of Unionism and Labourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A surprisingly important difference between our special issue and much of the trade union anthropology is our focus on unions within the workplace and the links we draw between the anthropologies of unionism and labour (c.f. Rubbers andRoy 2015 andNash 1993). A substantive section of trade union ethnography describes professional union organizers, often exploring uplifting political campaigns and complex court cases, while leaving shop-floor analysis to those (above) who focus on workers (Ashraf and Prentice 2019, Durrenberger and Erem 2005and Werbner 2014).…”
Section: Anthropologies Of Unionism and Labourmentioning
confidence: 99%