2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.anres.2016.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental impact of white shrimp culture during 2012–2013 at Bandon Bay, Surat Thani Province: A case study investigating farm size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The pond was in closed condition with no water exchange, and hence OM kept accumulating within the pond over time. However, sediments in this study contained a much lower OM content (12.7 ± 0.9 g kg − 1 ) than OM found in smallscale white shrimp farms (75.2 ± 38.7 g kg − 1 ) in southern Thailand [18]. In addition to the low OM content, the pH in sediments showed lower values when compared to the measured pH in water throughout the culture period.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pond was in closed condition with no water exchange, and hence OM kept accumulating within the pond over time. However, sediments in this study contained a much lower OM content (12.7 ± 0.9 g kg − 1 ) than OM found in smallscale white shrimp farms (75.2 ± 38.7 g kg − 1 ) in southern Thailand [18]. In addition to the low OM content, the pH in sediments showed lower values when compared to the measured pH in water throughout the culture period.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…In comparison to the L. vannamei small-scale farms in the southern region of Thailand, coastal shrimp farms used refilled water in culturing and produced 22.0 kg TKN t − 1 production [18], while sediment accumulation in this study generated~71.4 kg TKN t − 1 production or increased three-fold compared to their study. Our study showed that for the TN input, 17.0% was recovered in the 700 kg of shrimp biomass harvested from the pond.…”
Section: Nutrient Budget and Fcrmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The application of an intensive system in aquaculture can threaten the sustainability of the adjacent environment and the business itself (Na-nakorn et al 2017). Effluents from an intensive pond are rich in organic materials and chemical compounds as a result of artificial feed usage and shrimp defecation, which can potentially pollute adjacent bodies of water (Barraza-Guardado et al 2013), increase nutrient enrichment in the water, and trigger algal blooms 4696 that are harmful to other aquatic organisms (Herbeck et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPS used in the experiment had a low nitrogen content of 0.05% when compared with 0.12% of SS and SPS from the southern part of Thailand. Na nakorn et al [5] reported that SPS from Surat Thani, Thailand, contained high nitrogen content in the range of 0.32-0.59%. This might have been due to the shrimp being cultivated with only pallet food and the complete cleaning of the pond in every cultivation cycle.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Feed Substratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 6.69 million tons of SPS are annually produced from the shrimp farming cultivation process as bulky local waste. After harvesting, most small shrimp farms directly drain their SPS to the canal, which causes water pollution and various adverse effects on the aquatic ecosystem due to its high salinity [4] and high nitrogen (N) content, which is approximately 3.20-5.98 gN/kg [5]. In general, the SPS waste is not treated properly before disposal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%