2002
DOI: 10.1159/000065639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epidemiology of Myasthenia gravis: A Population-Based Study in Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract: A regional database of myasthenia gravis (MG) patients was used to estimate the prevalence and selected characteristics of the disease in the county of Stockholm, Sweden. The prevalence of MG was 14.1/100,000 (17.1 for women and 10.8 for men). The mean age at onset for women and men was 34.9 and 48.5 years, respectively. About 60% of patients were diagnosed within the first year after initial symptoms. Generalized MG was found in 79% of patients, and 10% had severe symptoms. Almost two thirds of the patients h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
46
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
46
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The present estimate (24 per 100,000 inhabitants) is the highest reported to date [1-2, 4, 7-12, 28-32] ( fig. 3 ) and clearly indicates an increasing prevalence in the province of Pavia, in accordance with other studies showing that prevalence rates for MG have increased over time [32] . A possible explanation for the high prevalence we found with respect to other studies is a greater reliability of the case-finding method, which should allow the identification of almost all MG patients resident in the study area even if we cannot exclude that some patients remain unrecognized.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The present estimate (24 per 100,000 inhabitants) is the highest reported to date [1-2, 4, 7-12, 28-32] ( fig. 3 ) and clearly indicates an increasing prevalence in the province of Pavia, in accordance with other studies showing that prevalence rates for MG have increased over time [32] . A possible explanation for the high prevalence we found with respect to other studies is a greater reliability of the case-finding method, which should allow the identification of almost all MG patients resident in the study area even if we cannot exclude that some patients remain unrecognized.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Transformation to a generalized form from OMG has not been as clearly delineated in CMG patients as in AMG cases [20]. Interestingly, the rate of transformation (12.4 %) in the present study was significantly lower than the rate (32.5 %) in the 220 AMG patients who have been followed up in the same way at the Hospital (Table 5), and by far lower than the expected rate (up to 80 %) in AMG population [21]. This difference between the CMG and AMG highlights the idea that CMG may constitute a distinctive clinical entity different from AMG patients in some aspects such as the rare presence of thymoma, high percentage of OMG and a tendency to relapse in CMG patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Autoantibodies to the AChR, MuSK, or Lrp4 are responsible for MG, an autoimmune disease with a prevalence of 1-2 in 10,000 (Kalb et al 2002;Murai et al 2011). Intermittent muscle weakness, which worsens after activity, is the hallmark feature of MG. Autoantibodies to the AChR are responsible for most ( 80%) cases of MG. A preponderance of these antibodies are directed to the main immunogenic region in the AChR a subunit, which can block AChR function, increase AChR turnover, and/or stimulate complement-mediated damage (Fig.…”
Section: Autoimmune Mg and Myastheniamentioning
confidence: 99%