Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Karnataka State, South India: Transmission dynamics of symptomatic vs. asymptomatic infections

Abstract

Background: In this report, we describe the epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection, specifically examining how the symptomatic persons drove the transmission in the state of Karnataka, India, during the lockdown phase. Methods: The study included all the cases reported from March 8 to May 31, 2020 in the state. Any person with history of international or domestic travel from high burden states, those presenting with Influenza-like or Severe Acute Respiratory Illness and high-risk contacts of COVID19 cases, who were SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive were included. Detailed analysis based on contact tracing data available from line-list of the state surveillance unit was performed using cluster analysis software package. Findings: Amongst the 3404 COVID-19 positive cases, 3096 (91%) were asymptomatic while 308 (9%) were symptomatic. Majority of the asymptomatic cases were in the age range of 16-50 years while symptomatic cases were between 31-65 years. Most of those affected were males. Cluster analysis of 822 cases indicated that the secondary attack rate, size of the cluster (dispersion) and occurrence of overt clinical illness is significantly higher when the index case in a cluster was symptomatic compared to an asymptomatic. Interpretation: Our findings indicate that both asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 cases transmit the infection; however, the main driving force behind the spread of infection within the state was significantly higher from symptomatic cases. This has major implications for policies related to testing. Active search for symptomatic cases, subjecting them to testing and treatment should be prioritized for containing the spread of COVID-19.

Incidence and transmission dynamics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) among fresh recruits in a Training Establishment of Indian Armed Forces: An observational study

“…[18] On consideration of closed environments and spread of COVID-19, the incident of the infamous cruise ship comes to mind that was stranded off the coasts of Norway and harbored 712 positive cases, with an SAR of 45%. [19] In India, a study by Laxminarayan et al on transmission dynamics in states of Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh, SAR estimates ranged from 1.2% (0.0-5.1%) in health-care settings to 2.6% (1.6-3.9%) in the community, 9.0% (7.5-10.5%) in the household and up to 79.3% in those who traveled and shared conveyances for more than 6 h. [20] In comparison, the SAR of 15.59% in this study, despite the congregated setting, can be credited to the strict quarantine, stringent adherence to preventive measures, isolation, and cohorting employed by the administration.…”

COVID-19 Pandemic in India: Through the Lens of Modeling

“…30 The large number of patients detected by contact tracing who are asymptomatic at the time of testing suggests an overall milder impact of the disease. 31 Plausible explanations in support of India's low fatality rates include crossimmunity, genetics, prior vaccination, younger population, a predominantly outdoor lifestyle in rural areas, and plenty of outside air circulating through homes in urban settings. India is nearly 70% rural whereas European countries are overwhelmingly urban, facilitating the spread of the virus.…”

An agent based model for assessing transmission dynamics and health systems burden for COVID-19

“…There have been several interventions in unison to combat the infection such as the use of face masks, sanitizers, following social distancing, avoiding mass gatherings, lockdowns, and others [38]. The incubation period of infected patients in India is seen to be longer (6.93 days) according to recent researches [39] with a larger proportion of the infected being asymptomatic (91%) [40]. The incubation period and proportion of asymptomatic infections have been altered to perform sensitivity analysis (SA) across five scenarios as shown in Figure 4(a)-(e).…”