Equidistance judgments in the vicinity of a binocular illusion.

Agee, Frank L.; Gogel, Walter C.

doi:10.1037/h0024483

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is possible that a retinal disparity that exists beween objects or edges close to each other is more effective than a disparity that makes itself fell over a larger distance. This might be inferred from findings by Agee and Gogel (1967) and Gogel and Newton (1969), that absence of disparity between objects that are close to each other has more effect on their location in depth than when the same condition prevails between more dis tam objects. (For an example, see Note 6.)…”

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 91%

Two forms of retinal disparity

Wallach

Bacon

1976

Perception & Psychophysics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The retinal disparities in stereograms where the vertical alignment of pairs of homologous points in one eye differs from that in the other eye were found to be more effective than disparities that do not involve that kind of binocular difference. The presence of such "transverse disparities" was found to shorten the time elapsed until perceived depth was reported in four instances. in two simple stereogram pairs and in two different pairs of random dot pattern stereograms. In .an experiment where binocular parallax was in conflict with an effect of past experience. the presente of transverse disparities caused binocular parallax to prevail. The presumption that the amount of perceived depth depends only on the amount of disparity (provided distances from the eyes are unchanged) and not on the configuration in which it manifests itself was found not to hold in stereograms containing transverse disparities.

show abstract

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 91%

Two forms of retinal disparity

Wallach

Bacon

1976

Perception & Psychophysics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In other words, at Position 4, the left point of light is correctly perceived with respect to the left end of the window, and the right point of light is correctly perceived with respect to the right end of the window. In general, the depth between a point of light and the end of the window most directionally adjacent to that point of light will be perceived correctly (Agee & Gogel, 1967;Gogel, 1954Gogel, , 1956Gogel & Newton, 1969). On the other hand, the depth between a point of light and the end of the window directionally most displaced from this point of light will be incorrectly per-ceived.…”

Section: University Of California Santa Barbaramentioning

confidence: 96%