2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.105.119902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Gamma Rays from Ultracompact Primordial Dark Matter Minihalos [Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 211301 (2009)]

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
119
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
119
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The halo density required to power a dark star of a given mass and luminosity can be estimated using Equation (14) in Iocco et al (2008). The self-annihilation time t SA for a halo with a given dark matter density can then be obtained by, e.g., inverting Equation (6) in Scott & Sivertsson (2009). The self-annihilation times obtained in this manner are rather approximate, relying on a number of assumptions we already know to be violated in the first stars (a constant halo self-annihilation rate and the constant infall of WIMPs from a uniform, unbound dark matter halo with an assumed velocity structure).…”
Section: Stellar Structure and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The halo density required to power a dark star of a given mass and luminosity can be estimated using Equation (14) in Iocco et al (2008). The self-annihilation time t SA for a halo with a given dark matter density can then be obtained by, e.g., inverting Equation (6) in Scott & Sivertsson (2009). The self-annihilation times obtained in this manner are rather approximate, relying on a number of assumptions we already know to be violated in the first stars (a constant halo self-annihilation rate and the constant infall of WIMPs from a uniform, unbound dark matter halo with an assumed velocity structure).…”
Section: Stellar Structure and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One outstanding prediction of cosmological simulations using cold dark matter particles is that the Milky Way halo should be heavily populated with thousands of smaller dark matter subhalos as a result of the hierarchical assembly process (Klypin et al 1999;Moore et al 1999;Springel et al 2008). Dark matter subhalos would include any dark matter configuration, from those hosting the largest known dwarf spheroidal galaxies in the Milky Way to the lightest predicted dark matter substructures with masses around 10 −4 M e (Ricotti & Gould 2009;Scott & Sivertsson 2009). Conceptually in this scenario, the bulk of the subhalo population is made up by small-scale dark matter substructures with limited or null star formation, which would be almost impossible to detect in existing optical surveys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their early formation, the central regions of UCMHs would have a high dark matter (DM) density. If DM is in the form of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs), WIMP annihilation within UCMHs may lead to an observable gamma-ray signal [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scott & Sivertsson [7] have investigated gamma-ray emission from UCMHs formed from perturbations which * ppxaj1@nottingham.ac.uk † anne.green@nottingham.ac.uk enter the horizon at three different epochs in the early Universe: e + e − annihilation, and the QCD and electroweak (EW) phase transitions. They find that an UCMH corresponding to the e + e − annihilation epoch, which has present day mass M UCMH (z = 0) ∼ 10 2 M ⊙ , could be detected by the Fermi satellite or current Air Cherenkov telescopes (ACTs), at a distance of 100 pc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%