2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4959030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: “Temperature dependence of contact and dipolar NMR chemical shifts in paramagnetic molecules” [J. Chem. Phys. 142, 054108 (2015)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
65
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
6
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 for a discussion on the treatment of ZFS in paramagnetic NMR). Pseudocontact shifts were not included either, because the evaluation in spin‐delocalized systems should be approached differently from the conventional point‐dipole approximation,16c, 28 and several iron complexes have been successfully modeled by the contact term only 20. 25…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…16 for a discussion on the treatment of ZFS in paramagnetic NMR). Pseudocontact shifts were not included either, because the evaluation in spin‐delocalized systems should be approached differently from the conventional point‐dipole approximation,16c, 28 and several iron complexes have been successfully modeled by the contact term only 20. 25…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, application of such computations to paramagnetic species is a considerable challenge. The first quantum‐chemical methods to calculate paramagnetic NMR (pNMR) properties that went beyond the pure contact shifts were only devised in the early 2000s and, even though refinements and further developments have been made since then, pNMR calculations remain far from routine . Extension of the present computational techniques to pNMR properties of infinite periodic solids is in its infancy and is probably one of the final frontiers of computational NMR spectroscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, contact ( c c T −1 ) and pseudocontact ( c pc T −2 ) terms contribute to the change in chemical shifts. While the former is caused by a non‐zero spin densities on the nucleus of interest (the isotropic Fermi contact mechanism), the latter exclusively arises from the anisotropic dipole–dipole mechanism [18] . Figure 4 b represents a plot of paramagnetic shifts against reciprocal temperatures with the least squares regression.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%