1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(199911)10:5<899::aid-jmri40>3.0.co;2-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error assessment due to coronary stents in flow-encoded phase contrast MR angiography: a phantom study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 In this study, a significant decrease in flow velocity measurements was noted when measured near the stent. In stents with material properties yielding high magnetic susceptibility, phase offset phenomena apparently reduce flow measurements significantly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…19 In this study, a significant decrease in flow velocity measurements was noted when measured near the stent. In stents with material properties yielding high magnetic susceptibility, phase offset phenomena apparently reduce flow measurements significantly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…35 Similarly, phase contrast CMR imaging is well validated for assessment of native valvular regurgitation, 10, 11 but can be compromised by localized field disturbances as can be produced by prosthetic materials. 19, 20 Of course, prosthetic materials within both bio- and mechanical mitral valves can produce susceptibility artifacts due to localized changes in magnetic field homogeneity, 21, 22 prohibiting direct cine-CMR evaluation of valve morphology and obscuring small amounts of regurgitant flow. However, our results demonstrate that such localized disturbances do not typically interfere with assessment of substantial (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8,13,14 One study, however, detected a notable error in flow measurements in the presence of stents. 15 Furthermore, detection, direct visualization, and classification of in-stent restenosis are important. Although nitinol stents cause smaller artifacts when compared with stainless steel stents, 6,16 even the former are still not artifact-free on MR images 6 and do not allow for visualization of in-stent restenosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%