2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-018-1246-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error bounds for monomial convexification in polynomial optimization

Abstract: Convex hulls of monomials have been widely studied in the literature, and monomial convexifications are implemented in global optimization software for relaxing polynomials. However, there has been no study of the error in the global optimum from such approaches. We give bounds on the worst-case error for convexifying a monomial over subsets of [0, 1] n . This implies additive error bounds for relaxing a polynomial optimization problem by convexifying each monomial separately. Our main error bounds depend prim… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let S and P be defined as in (1). Next, we show that we may assume without loss of generality that P is full dimension.…”
Section: Dealing With Low Dimensional Polytopementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let S and P be defined as in (1). Next, we show that we may assume without loss of generality that P is full dimension.…”
Section: Dealing With Low Dimensional Polytopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, a constraint of the form f (x) = b is replaced with f (x) ≤ b and f (x) ≥ b, where f is a convex lower approximation and f is a concave upper approximation of f . While there have been a lot of work in function convexification (see for instance [3,49,5,46,35,10,38,6,8,7,41,18,47,45,39,55,56,36,12,16,1,27,51]) it is well-known that it does not necessarily yield the convex hull of the set {x | f (x) = b}. To the best of our knowledge, there have been much less work on explicit convexification of sets: [54,42,43,53,25,32,44,17,34,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important area of study regarding convexification schemes for QCQPs is to convexify commonly occurring substructures, like in the case of integer programming. However, most of the work in this direction in the global optimization area has been focused on convexification of functions (i.e., finding convex and concave envelopes), see for example [4,46,33,10,36,9,8,38,21,48,45,37,52,53,16,19,1,26]. There are relatively lesser number of results on convexification of sets [51,41,42,50,24,30,44,20,32,17,40,23].…”
Section: Introduction 1motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%