Errors in Cancer Diagnosis: Current Understanding and Future Directions

Abstract

Purpose Errors in cancer diagnosis are likely the most harmful and expensive types of diagnostic errors. We reviewed the literature to understand the prevalence, origins, and prevention of errors in cancer diagnosis, focusing on common cancers for which early diagnosis offers clear benefit (melanoma and cancers of the breast, colon, and lung). Methods We searched the Cochrane Library and PubMed from 1966 until April 2007 for publications that met our review criteria and manually searched references of key publications. Our search yielded 110 studies, of which nine were prospective studies and the remaining were retrospective studies. Results Errors in cancer diagnosis were not uncommon in autopsy studies and were associated with significant harm and expense in malpractice claims. Literature on prevalence was scant. For each type of cancer, we classified preventable errors according to their origins in patient-physician encounters in the clinic setting, diagnostic test or procedure performance, pathologic confirmation of diagnosis, follow-up of patient or test result, or patient-related delays. Conclusion The literature reflects advanced knowledge of contributory factors and prevention for diagnostic errors related to the performance of procedures and imaging tests and emerging understanding of pathology errors. However, prospective studies are few, as are studies of diagnostic errors arising from the clinical encounter and patient follow-up. Future research should examine further the system and cognitive problems that lead to the many contributory factors we identified, and address interdisciplinary interventions to prevent errors in cancer diagnosis.

Co-regulated expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and transforming growth factor-β in melanoma development and progression

“…In melanoma, prognostic markers are needed that would help to refine the risk of progression, assess the clinical outcome and select optimal treatment strategies (1)(2)(3). In normal epithelial cells, transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) acts as a strong inhibitor of cell growth (4).…”

Preliminary Evaluation of Biplane Correlation (BCI) Stereographic Imaging for Lung Nodule Detection

“…For a reader to distinguish a lesion in a background of anatomical noise, the lesion needs to be an order of magnitude larger than the same lesion on a quantum-limited background [3]. Another report determined that anatomical obstructions result in a 71 % miss rate [18]. Viewing biplane images stereoscopically provides the radiologist with a visual reduction of anatomical noise.…”

Double reading for gross tumor volume assessment in radiotherapy planning

“…Additionally, the current study demonstrated no histopathological confirmations but substantial interobserver variability in GTV contouring. Although previous studies suggested that the "double reading" can reduce errors in diagnostic radiology [10,11] , efforts are underway in our institution to resolve these issues, especially the accuracy of GTV assessments in the "double reading" system. Nevertheless, the "double reading" system should provide the clinical consensus and the clinical training in GTV contouring.…”

“…Errors in diagnostic radiology are common, and dialogue among clinicians and radiologists, the evaluation of multimodal images, and iterative readings are thought to decrease the error [10][11][12][13][14] . Therefore, a practical consensus for GTV assessments, similar to the "double reading" approach, must be developed.…”