The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals 2013
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-85617-633-0.00015-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Errors, Recovery Processes, and Error Estimates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is seen from Figure 6c that with the increasing of the total elements in the FEM model, the FEM results shift to the lower frequency side and move closer to the MRRM result. This fact is in accordance with the convergence process of the FEM analysis [68]. The discrete FEM model generally overvalues the stiffness of the real structure for the following reason.…”
Section: Validation Of Theoretical Methods By Experimental Measurementmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is seen from Figure 6c that with the increasing of the total elements in the FEM model, the FEM results shift to the lower frequency side and move closer to the MRRM result. This fact is in accordance with the convergence process of the FEM analysis [68]. The discrete FEM model generally overvalues the stiffness of the real structure for the following reason.…”
Section: Validation Of Theoretical Methods By Experimental Measurementmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Figure 6a compares the result by the MRRM theoretical analysis with the damping ratios being 0.01, the result by the FBG experiment, and the result by the FEM with the isotropic structural loss factors being 0.01 [65] and with 6227 elements. The FEM result corresponding to the most refined mesh (i.e., extremely finer mesh) is selected in Figure 6a for comparison, because it should be the most accurate FEM result among the four cases of element sizes according to the convergence criterion of FEM analysis [68]. Figure 6a indicates that the transmission spectra obtained by MRRM theory, by FBG experiment, and by FEM simulation are agreed in general within the considered frequency range.…”
Section: Validation Of Theoretical Methods By Experimental Measurementmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Similar projections, though often performed element-by-element, are used in a posteriori error estimation methods, to quantify the distance between the finite element solution and an actual equilibrium solution, i.e., the discretization error [27,28]. However, the objective here is opposite, i.e., we want to discard the discretization error and quantify the intrinsic equilibrium gap of the considered finite element field.…”
Section: Body Stresses Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%