2017
DOI: 10.21769/bioprotoc.2256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Escherichia coli Infection of Drosophila

Abstract: Following septic insults, healthy insects, just like vertebrates, mount a complex immune response to contain and destroy pathogens. The failure to efficiently clear bacterial infections in immuno-compromised fly mutants leads to higher mortality rates which provide a powerful indicator for genes with important roles in innate immunity. The following protocol is designed to reproducibly inject a known amount of non-pathogenic E. coli into otherwise sterile flies and to measure the survival of flies after infect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wildtype Oregon-R Drosophila flies were treated with sucrose solutions containing various concentrations of S. cerevisiae ( Fig. 2a and Additional file 2), and compared to the pathogenicity of known entomopathogenic Gram-positive Bacillus cereus and Micrococcus luteus, as well as Gram-negative Escherichia coli and Serratia liquefaciens bacteria [7,[20][21][22] (Figs. 2b-e, respectively).…”
Section: Susceptibility Of Drosophila Melanogaster To Saccharomyces Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wildtype Oregon-R Drosophila flies were treated with sucrose solutions containing various concentrations of S. cerevisiae ( Fig. 2a and Additional file 2), and compared to the pathogenicity of known entomopathogenic Gram-positive Bacillus cereus and Micrococcus luteus, as well as Gram-negative Escherichia coli and Serratia liquefaciens bacteria [7,[20][21][22] (Figs. 2b-e, respectively).…”
Section: Susceptibility Of Drosophila Melanogaster To Saccharomyces Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infection experiments were performed as described previously 30,31,78 . In brief, virgins (4‐5 days old) were injected with 80 nL PBS containing a mean of 1600 heated‐killed E. coli (DH5α, GFP, OD600 = 0.1) using a pico‐injector (model PLI‐188; Nikon).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore elected to associate Dmel flies with a strain of Lactobacillus brevis, or with one of Acetobacter pomorum, both of which had been isolated from a laboratory population of Dmel and are frequently used for microbiota studies (19,20). In order to test whether any generic bacterium could restore repellency in axenic Dmel, we also associated Dmel flies with a strain of Escherichia coli previously shown as nonpathogenic to flies (21). Dmel inoculation with L. brevis made Dmel repellent to Ds (p < 0.01) while association with A. pomorum and E. coli did not (Fig.…”
Section: Bacterial Symbionts Of Dmel Are Involved In Repellency and Ds Avoidance Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%