2000
DOI: 10.1109/78.852000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ESPRIT-based 2-D direction finding with a sparse uniform array of electromagnetic vector sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
149
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
149
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A multiple invariant rectangular array is shown in Figure 7. Several methods have been proposed for direction finding and/or other parameter estimation using MI sensor arrays, e.g., [24,27,28,34]. An important assumption of these methods is that the incoming signals are narrowband, so that the propagation delay of the signals from one subarray to another can be approximated by phase shift.…”
Section: B3 the Dp-tals Algorithm With Multiple Invariance Sensor Armentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multiple invariant rectangular array is shown in Figure 7. Several methods have been proposed for direction finding and/or other parameter estimation using MI sensor arrays, e.g., [24,27,28,34]. An important assumption of these methods is that the incoming signals are narrowband, so that the propagation delay of the signals from one subarray to another can be approximated by phase shift.…”
Section: B3 the Dp-tals Algorithm With Multiple Invariance Sensor Armentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The th polarization vector with orientation uncertainties is (16) where the rotation matrix accounts for the overall orientation errors at the horizontal components of the three-component sensors (17) In presence of sensor-orientation uncertainties, the polarization matrix of the model (10) for the overall wavefields becomes (18) 3) Parametric Model With Positional and Rotational Calibration Errors: Summarizing, in the case of multiple-wavefield and multiple-sensor with calibration uncertainties of both position and orientation, the output signal in (11) is modified as (19) where describes the array manifold for wavefields in the presence of sensor-calibration errors, with and defined as in (15) and (18), respectively. The unknown shape and sensor-calibration error for the th wavefield can be summed up in the set of parameters (20) where accounts for the deterministic shape parameters of the th wavefield defined in (12), and , and are random calibration errors.…”
Section: ) Vector-sensors With Rotational Calibration Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE) of polarization parameters has been discussed in [10] and [11], whereas in [12] the authors presented a method for incorporating signal polarization in Capon's minimum variance estimator. Subspace-based methods, which are known to be computational efficient but still consistent, have been also proposed: a MUSIC-based approach is discussed in [13], and ESPRIT-based direction/polarization estimations are found in [14] for polarized signals with two-component sensors, in [15] and [16] using a sparse array of electromagnetic vector-sensors, and in [17] using a single electromagnetic vector sensor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A vector-sensor comprises two or more collocated different types of scalar-sensors and is generally advantageous over a scalar-sensor, eg, for an electromagnetic vectorsensor, it can additionally exploit the polarization difference among the received signals [19]. Traditionally the output of a vector-sensor array is preprocessed to be a long-vector [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], while several recent approaches utilize hypercomplex (eg, quaternion [18], bicomplex [28], biquaternion [29,30], quad-quaternion [31], Euclidean 3-space [32]) or tensorial (eg, fourth-order interspectral tensor [33]) models. The use of hypercomplex algebra provides a compact way of handling of the recorded data, and demonstrates its unique characteristics in reduced memory consumption and improved robustness to model errors [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%