Essential tremor quantification during activities of daily living

Abstract

Background Essential tremor (ET), characterized primarily by postural and kinetic tremor, is typically measured in the clinic with subjective tremor rating scales. These ratings are often used to adjust medications and assess efficacy in clinical trials. However, tremor ratings require the presence of a clinician and do not necessarily capture tremor fluctuations throughout the day during activities of daily living (ADL). Objective To evaluate the ability of motion sensors to discriminate tremor from voluntary posture and motion, classify tremor as postural or kinetic, and rate tremor severity during standardized tasks and non-standardized activities of daily living. Methods Ten subjects with ET wore motion sensors on the index finger and performed standardized motor tasks from the Washington Heights-Inwood Genetic Study of Essential Tremor (WHIGET) tremor rating scale (wTRS) and non-standardized ADL tasks. Four movement disorder specialists independently rated video segments of the standardized tasks but not the ADL tasks. Quantitative features were extracted from the motion sensors and used to develop mathematical models for predicting rating scores from kinematic data. Results The quantitative motion features were highly correlated with wTRS ratings for postural (r=0.90) and kinetic (r=0.80) tremors. Mathematical models produced tremor ratings that correlated strongly with clinician ratings of the wTRS tasks (mean r=0.80) and also produced ADL task ratings that correlated well with the most recent clinician wTRS ratings (mean r=0.72). Conclusions Recordings from motion sensors can be used to classify tremor as postural or kinetic and quantify tremor severity during both standardized and non-standardized activities.

Clinician versus machine: Reliability and responsiveness of motor endpoints in Parkinson's disease

“…Many of these systems also permit home monitoring, thus enabling the recording of motor fluctuations throughout the day and in their typical settings [4,15–17]. Advanced signal processing algorithms are able to discriminate tremor and dyskinesia from voluntary movements enacted during activities of daily living [3,18]. Motion sensor systems have also shown promise at yielding biomarkers for differentiating disease states from controls based on analyzed measurements of gait and balance [19–21].…”

TREMOR12: An Open-Source Mobile App for Tremor Quantification

“…Modern portable technology could provide cost-effective tools for tremor quantification, but need further development. Quantitative features can be extracted from the motion sensors on the device and used to develop mathematical models for predicting rating scores from kinematic data [3]. Accelerometers integrated in smartphones or wrist-worn devices can also be used for this purpose [4], which lowers the threshold for tremor quantification during activities of daily living.…”

A Novel Glove Monitoring System Used to Quantify Neurological Symptoms During Deep-Brain Stimulation Surgery

“…For the action tremor in PD, the root-mean-square (RMS) sum of both gyroscope and accelerometer data had the highest correlation with UPDRS (r 2 = 0.69) [24] In this system, the logarithm of the peak powers summation of the IMU sensor signals is regarded as the tremor amplitude.…”