1991
DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-72-4-907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishment of latency in vitro by the herpes simplex virus type 1 mutant in 1814

Abstract: The herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) mutant in1814 possesses an insertion mutation that abolishes trans-activation of immediate early (IE) transcription by the virion protein Vmw65. Interactions between in 1814 and the host cell were examined by use of an in vitro latency system which relies on infection of human foetal lung (HFL) cells at 42 °C to prevent lytic growth of virus. Mutant in 1814 was retained in HFL cells after infection at low m.o.i, and incubation at 42 °C, and was reactivated by superinfect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
78
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From this, the other VP16-induced IE gene products may be evolutionary consequences of viral replication in the face of robust host defensive responses during reactivation and therefore have no obligate roles in the initial stages of reactivation from latency. There is accumulating genetic data to support this view (2,8,24).…”
Section: Vol 76 2002 Microarray Analysis Of Hsv-1 Vp16 Activation Mmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…From this, the other VP16-induced IE gene products may be evolutionary consequences of viral replication in the face of robust host defensive responses during reactivation and therefore have no obligate roles in the initial stages of reactivation from latency. There is accumulating genetic data to support this view (2,8,24).…”
Section: Vol 76 2002 Microarray Analysis Of Hsv-1 Vp16 Activation Mmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Production of functional IE110 has been shown to be important in reactivation of HSV both in vivo (Leib et al, 1989) and in an in vitro model of latency (Harris & Preston, 1991). Thus, detection of IE110 promoter-driven lacZ expression would be predicted to provide a sensitive marker for virus reactivation.…”
Section: The Assessment Of Ie110 Promoter Activity During Reactivatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence of reduced IE transcription, in1814 is unable to initiate productive infection efficiently and thus, at low m.o.i., only a small proportion (0.1 1%, depending ~n the cell type) of virus-cell interactions result in virus replication (Ace et al, 1989;Daksis & Preston, 1992). The vast majority of infected cells harbour the in1814 genome in a stable quiescent state that has been termed ~in vitro latency' (Harris & Preston, 1991). By 1 day after infection, in1814 genomes become insensitive to activation by Vmw65 or hexamethylene bisacetamide (HMBA), even though these agents effectively complement the defect in virus replication if applied at the time of infection (Ace et al, 1989;Harris & Preston, 1991 ;McFarlane et al, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%