Estandarización de una batería para la evaluación de factores de riesgo psicosociales laborales en trabajadores colombianos

Gómez, Viviola; Camacho, Sebastián Segura; Castrillón, Diego; Perilla, Lyria Esperanza

doi:10.14718/acp.2016.19.2.10.

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the consolidated measurement models that are widely accepted in the field and that present a strong rationale and empirical evidence of their technical quality are those with five factors or less (e.g., COPSOQ [5 factors], JCQ [5 factors], DECORE [4 factors]), and that each of their factors has a considerable number of items exceeding the minimum acceptable (Streiner, 1994). In the case of the IIA-PRF recommended for its application in NOM-035-STPS-2018, it does not take up these consolidated models and does not justify its alignment to the Battery of Instruments for the Assessment of Psychosocial Risk Factors developed by the Colombian Ministry of Social Protection (MPS) in 2010 (Ministerio de la Protección Social, 2010), which, in different studies of its psychometric properties does not meet many of the technical quality standards (Rubio-Castro and Luna-García, 2015;Gómez et al, 2016;Albarrán et al, 2018).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factor structure and measurement invariance of the psychosocial risk factors inventory of NOM-035-STPS-2018

Cano-Gutiérrez

Pérez-Morán²,

Bernal-Baldenebro

et al. 2023

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The primary objective of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of the Inventory for the Identification and Analysis of Psychosocial Risk Factors (IIA-PRF) of Reference Guide III proposed in NOM-035-STPS-2018. A total of 2,149 workers in Baja California, Mexico’s industrial and education-government sectors, were administered an online inventory version. Preliminary analyses were performed, as well as a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) based on two models proposed by the standard itself: an eight-factor model (8-FM) and a four-factor model (4-FM). Likewise, based on the results and with the recommendations of the specialists, a threefactor model (3-FM) was proposed. In addition, nested model sequencing methods were subsequently applied to validate the invariance between the origin of the activity. The dimensionality of 3-FM was found to have adequate fit values according to a-priori established criteria. It is concluded that the IIAPRF does not have the reliability and validity parameters necessary to support interpretations, uses and consequences based on the theoretical structure established by NOM-035-STPS-2018 and that, although the 3-FM presents better reliability and validity indices, it is not invariant in terms of the origin of the activity. Finally, we discuss the implications and recommend reviewing and adjusting the design of the IIAPRF items to extend the measurement of invariance to other groups of relevance for decision making in the improvement of the work environment.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factor structure and measurement invariance of the psychosocial risk factors inventory of NOM-035-STPS-2018

Cano-Gutiérrez

Pérez-Morán²,

Bernal-Baldenebro

et al. 2023

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Factores psicosociales que influyen en el ausentismo

Guerrero

Carrillo

Ruiz

2020

Interd

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

El objetivo del presente estudio es evaluar un modelo explicativo del ausentismo laboral, con base en la relación entre los factores de riesgo psicosocial y la mediación de la percepción de relaciones sociales y del estrés laboral; este se conformó con base en las predicciones de modelos teóricos como Demandas-Control, Desbalance Esfuerzo-Recompensas y Apoyo Social, implícitos en el instrumento usado, así como en los antecedentes de investigación consultados. Para ello, se lleva a cabo un modelado con ecuaciones estructurales con los datos de medición de riesgo psicosocial y ausentismo hecha con 252 trabajadores de una compañía agroindustrial del departamento del Cesar en Colombia; fue aplicada la Batería de Riesgo Psicosocial de Villalobos, Vargas, Rondón y Felknor (2013a, 2013b). Con base en los indicadores de bondad de ajuste, se descartó el modelo teórico inicial, así como otros dos modelos planteados, por lo que se afirma que solo algunas formas específicas de ausentismo son determinadas por el estrés laboral producto de la conjunción de riesgo ante relaciones interpersonales y demandas laborales, combinado con riesgo proveniente de condiciones extralaborales. La inclusión de las relaciones interpersonales en el modelo es totalmente esperable con base en los hallazgos de diferentes investigaciones precedentes. Por otro lado, la exclusión del factor control sobre el trabajo fue inesperada, pues en estudios antecedentes esta guardó mayor relación con el ausentismo que las demandas del trabajo. Se discute sobre las limitaciones del estudio y sobre la necesidad de complejizar en Colombia la investigación sobre la relación del riesgo psicosocial con otros constructos psicológicos y con las consecuencias organizacionales.

show abstract

Instruments to identify psychosocial risk factors at work: a systematic review

Suárez-Reyes

Aguilar-Morales

Medina

2020

JLDE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The human factor within organizations is exposed to different types of risks, especially those that cause damage to their physical and psychological health, which if not identified and treated in time can generate irreversible damage to them. In recent years, investigations have been carried out that address the subject, in which different instruments have been implemented to identify and evaluate this phenomenon, so the purpose of this systematic review article was to analyze the instruments that allow identifying the factors of Psychosocial risks at work (FPR) in Latin America. The information search included databases on the web, such as Redalyc, Dialnet, Scielo and ProQuest. Three people independently selected the articles for review, in a period from 2015 to 2020, where the methodological quality of each of them was evaluated, as well as the inclusion and exclusion criteria considered for the research. It was observed that in recent years different methods and instruments have been implemented to evaluate this phenomenon from different areas, so it is important to determine which are the optimal instruments to identify FPR in workers.

show abstract

Estandarización de una batería para la evaluación de factores de riesgo psicosociales laborales en trabajadores colombianos

Cited by 4 publications

References 48 publications

Factor structure and measurement invariance of the psychosocial risk factors inventory of NOM-035-STPS-2018

Factor structure and measurement invariance of the psychosocial risk factors inventory of NOM-035-STPS-2018

Factores psicosociales que influyen en el ausentismo

Instruments to identify psychosocial risk factors at work: a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About