2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating actual evapotranspiration from stony-soils in montane ecosystems

Abstract: Highlights i) Numerical simulation of actual evapotranspiration (ET) from natural/montane ecosystems ii) Stone hydraulic properties reveal contribution to soil water availability iii) Effect of soil stone content on actual evapotranspiration was quantified

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existence of RFs in soil alters the hydrological condition of a watershed, and knowledge about their impacts is required in vadose zone hydrology, land surface modeling, groundwater recharge prediction, and environmental planning. In particular, RFs influence evapotranspiration (Parajuli et al., 2019), infiltration (Brakensiek & Rawls, 1994; van Wesemael et al., 1996), and the generation of surface runoff (Poesen & Lavee, 1994; Sauer & Logsdon, 2002). These effects result from variations in bulk density, pore‐size distribution, pore connectivity and, more generally, water retention curve (WRC), and hydraulic conductivity (HCC) of the soil (Li et al., 2020; Naseri et al., 2019; Poesen & Lavee, 1994; Torri et al., 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existence of RFs in soil alters the hydrological condition of a watershed, and knowledge about their impacts is required in vadose zone hydrology, land surface modeling, groundwater recharge prediction, and environmental planning. In particular, RFs influence evapotranspiration (Parajuli et al., 2019), infiltration (Brakensiek & Rawls, 1994; van Wesemael et al., 1996), and the generation of surface runoff (Poesen & Lavee, 1994; Sauer & Logsdon, 2002). These effects result from variations in bulk density, pore‐size distribution, pore connectivity and, more generally, water retention curve (WRC), and hydraulic conductivity (HCC) of the soil (Li et al., 2020; Naseri et al., 2019; Poesen & Lavee, 1994; Torri et al., 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data‐driven estimation of ET usually invokes the assumption of vertical, one‐dimensional (1D) flow, such that soil‐moisture sensors are placed within a 1D soil column with homogeneous soil properties (Breña Naranjo et al., 2011; Galleguillos et al., 2017; Parajuli et al., 2019). A key advantage of ensemble‐based (Bayesian) data assimilation (DA) methodologies is that their estimates of the relevant system parameters and state variables are equipped with uncertainty (error) bounds (Boso & Tartakovsky, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prime example of such strategies for sustainable development is drip irrigation, which is mainly deployed in areas facing severe water scarcity (Lamm et al, 2012;Latif et al, 2016), for crops such as cotton and maize (Sampathkumar et al, 2012). Around 2.9 million acres of croplands in California are equipped with drip irrigation systems, which make up about 60% of all drip irrigation in the US (Anderson, 2019).Data-driven estimation of ET usually invokes the assumption of vertical, one-dimensional (1D) flow, such that soil-moisture sensors are placed within a 1D soil column with homogeneous soil properties (Breña Naranjo et al, 2011;Galleguillos et al, 2017;Parajuli et al, 2019). A key advantage of ensemble-based (Bayesian) data assimilation (DA) methodologies is that their estimates of the relevant system parameters and state variables are equipped with uncertainty (error) bounds (Boso & Tartakovsky, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existence of RF in soil alters the hydrological condition of a watershed and knowledge about their impacts is required in vadose zone hydrology, land surface modeling, groundwater recharge prediction and environmental planning. In particular, RF influence evapotranspiration (Parajuli et al, 2019), infiltration (Brakensiek and Rawls, 1994;van Wesemael et al, 1996), and the generation of surface runoff (Sauer and Logsdon, 2002;Poesen and Lavee, 1994). These effects result from variations in bulk density, pore size distribution (PSD), pore connectivity and, more general, water retention curve (WRC), and hydraulic conductivity (HCC) of the soil (Torri et al, 1994;Poesen & Lavee, 1994;Naseri et al, 2019;Li et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%