2017
DOI: 10.5194/hess-2016-355
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating epikarst water storage by time-lapse surface to depth gravity measurements

Abstract: Abstract:In this study we attempt to evaluate the magnitude of epikarstic water storage variation in various karst settings using a relative spring gravimeter. Gravity measurements are performed two times a year at the surface and inside caves at different depths on three karst hydrosystems in southern France: two limestone karst systems and one dolomite karst system. We find that water storage variations occur mainly in the first ten meters of karst unsaturated zone. Afterward, surface to depth gravity measur… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implication of this finding is that hydrograph separation techniques may have limited applicability in less mature karst landscapes for differentiating soil hydrologic processes (e.g., piping through macropores) from tertiary pathways such as sinkholes and swallets. Findings from the Camden Creek analysis agree with the prevailing thought that the epikarst acts as a dynamic zone of water transfer and storage during moderate to extreme events (Aquilina, Ladouche, & Dörfliger, ; Champollion et al, ; Husic, Fox, Adams, et al, ; Williams, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The implication of this finding is that hydrograph separation techniques may have limited applicability in less mature karst landscapes for differentiating soil hydrologic processes (e.g., piping through macropores) from tertiary pathways such as sinkholes and swallets. Findings from the Camden Creek analysis agree with the prevailing thought that the epikarst acts as a dynamic zone of water transfer and storage during moderate to extreme events (Aquilina, Ladouche, & Dörfliger, ; Champollion et al, ; Husic, Fox, Adams, et al, ; Williams, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…(2009) and Champollion et al. (2018). The SG iOSG#024 (Boy et al., 2020) was installed in 2015 at a depth of 512 m (507 m.a.s.l.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Considered individually, these methods have specific limitations in terms of resolution and depth of observation but they also have their specific interest. For example, surface-based seismic methods are adapted to detecting horizontal objects [5], electrical method to characterizing fluid saturation and behavior [6], electromagnetic methods for identifying karst and factures, and inferring water content [7,8], microgravimetric methods to detect deeper heterogeneities that could be hydrogeological anomalies and to estimating water storage [9].…”
Section: Hydrogeophysical Approach For Subsoil Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%