1986
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000040039x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Generalized Soil‐water Characteristics from Texture

Abstract: Soil‐water potential and hydraulic conductivity relationships with soil‐water content are needed for many plant and soil‐water studies. Measurement of these relationships is costly, difficult, and often impractical. For many purposes, general estimates based on more readily available information such as soil texture are sufficient. Recent studies have developed statistical correlations between soil texture and selected soil potentials using a large data base, and also between selected soil textures and hydraul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
513
1
14

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,565 publications
(542 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
14
513
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Community-level means for root biomass, RL, specific RL, and root nitrogen content, stratified by depth, were measured monthly during 2005 (40). Soil water-holding capacity was calculated from soil texture and structural data by using the SPAW model (43). Fertility was assessed by the NNI, which quantifies actual nitrogen availability for plant growth through the dilution of nitrogen in closed canopies (44).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community-level means for root biomass, RL, specific RL, and root nitrogen content, stratified by depth, were measured monthly during 2005 (40). Soil water-holding capacity was calculated from soil texture and structural data by using the SPAW model (43). Fertility was assessed by the NNI, which quantifies actual nitrogen availability for plant growth through the dilution of nitrogen in closed canopies (44).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clay contents in plots 402, 409, and 311 were 16.25 %, 21.25 %, and 15.00 %, respectively, which was much higher than in other plots where soil water content was monitored. Higher clay contents in those three plots resulted in higher water-holding capacities (Saxton, Rawls, Romberger, & Papendick, 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…(16) is calculated as a function of soil clay content (f clay ; %) as proposed by Saxton et al (1986):…”
Section: Soil Ch 4 Diffusivity D Chmentioning
confidence: 99%