1976
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1976.tb00017.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Reliability From a Single Administration of a Criterion‐referenced Test*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
108
0
7

Year Published

1989
1989
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
108
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Classification consistency refers to how often a person taking an examination on multiple occasions would receive the same pass/fail decision. This report calculates decision consistency using Subkoviak's [8] method, which is relatively common when examining consistency in credentialing examinations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification consistency refers to how often a person taking an examination on multiple occasions would receive the same pass/fail decision. This report calculates decision consistency using Subkoviak's [8] method, which is relatively common when examining consistency in credentialing examinations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability estimates for internal consistency, test-retest correlation, and Subkoviak's (1976) CGA estimate for mastery tests are presented below. Descriptive statistics for the test takers are reported by group and subgroup.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A better way to estimate reliability for a standardized proficiency assessment is to report the probability of a mastery decision using the same cut score or criterion on a parallel test. Subkoviak's (1976) Coefficient of Agreement (CGA) estimate for a mastery decision reports the probability that the test takers would be assigned mastery on a parallel test to the first test, based on results from a single test administration.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using analytic or simulation approaches, several prior studies have examined the effect of measurement reliability on selection accuracy, which refers to the extent that the same classification decision is made based on true score and observed score based on single tests (e.g., Bradlow & Wainer, 1998;Rudner, 2001;Subkoviak, 1976;Swaminathan, Hambleton, & Algina, 1974). …”
Section: Clinical Vs Actuarial Judgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some of these methods are restrictive, such as applying only to dichotomously scored items, applying only to compensatory models, or lacking direct implications for prediction accuracy and subsequent utility estimation (e.g., Huynh, 1976;Livingston & Wingersky, 1979;Subkoviak, 1976). Livingston and Lewis (1995) introduced a classification accuracy estimation method that can be applied to more variety of conditions where many restrictive assumptions are not necessary.…”
Section: Selection Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%