2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the content of ground granulated blast furnace slag and different pozzolanas in hardened concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite of that, progress in PONCKS analysis has also been reported for quantification of SCMs such as fly ashes, slags and calcined clays [115][116][117]. Alternatively, amorphous SCMs in cement blends may be studied by SEM backscattered electron (BSE) image analysis with EDS element mapping [118][119][120] or solid-state NMR spectroscopy [19,121,122]. For example, the elemental compositions of fly ashes, measured by SEM-EDS analysis of around 20.000 particles, were plotted into Ca-Al-Si ternary frequency plots by Durdzinski et al [119], which allowed identification of four main groups of silicate phases with different Ca and Al contents.…”
Section: Assessing Scm Reactivity In Blended Cementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite of that, progress in PONCKS analysis has also been reported for quantification of SCMs such as fly ashes, slags and calcined clays [115][116][117]. Alternatively, amorphous SCMs in cement blends may be studied by SEM backscattered electron (BSE) image analysis with EDS element mapping [118][119][120] or solid-state NMR spectroscopy [19,121,122]. For example, the elemental compositions of fly ashes, measured by SEM-EDS analysis of around 20.000 particles, were plotted into Ca-Al-Si ternary frequency plots by Durdzinski et al [119], which allowed identification of four main groups of silicate phases with different Ca and Al contents.…”
Section: Assessing Scm Reactivity In Blended Cementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the silica content was low. The chemical composition of the GGBS and AL was determined and the results are presented in Tables 4 and 5 [36][37][38][39] were compared with the GGBS and AL used in this investigation. The calcium oxide in our materials was low compared to the other studies.…”
Section: Characterization Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the ratios of SiO 2 + Al 2 O 3 and CaO, as well as the Ca/(Si + Al) value, reflect its potential as an SCM and reveal differences in the pozzolanic reactivity and hydration activity. By analyzing the data presented in Table 3 , the ranges of the SiO 2 + Al 2 O 3 , CaO, and Ca/(Si + Al) of LS in comparison with C, FA, GGBS, SS, and SF were determined, as are shown in Figure 2 [ 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 ]. From this comprehensive analysis, it is evident that the composition of SiO 2 + Al 2 O 3 , CaO, and Ca/(Si + Al) in the relevant literature exhibits considerable variations, thereby falling within the specified ranges of 17.7–97.6%, 2.2–62.9%, and 0.02–1.94%, respectively.…”
Section: Physiochemical and Microscopic Analysis Of Lsmentioning
confidence: 99%