2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the sensitivity of four sampling methods for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae detection in live pigs using a Bayesian approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This confirms previous reports (Kurth and others 2002, Sibila and others 2004a, 2007, Marois and others 2007, Fablet and others 2010) and is consistent with the fact that not the nose, but the trachea and bronchi are the main multiplication sites of M hyopneumoniae (Blanchard and others 1992). In total, 90 pigs were restrained five times for collecting blood and BAL fluid, tracheo-bronchial and nasal swabs samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This confirms previous reports (Kurth and others 2002, Sibila and others 2004a, 2007, Marois and others 2007, Fablet and others 2010) and is consistent with the fact that not the nose, but the trachea and bronchi are the main multiplication sites of M hyopneumoniae (Blanchard and others 1992). In total, 90 pigs were restrained five times for collecting blood and BAL fluid, tracheo-bronchial and nasal swabs samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Nasal swabs, tracheo-bronchial swabs (Marois and others 2007, Fablet and others 2010) and BAL fluids (Villarreal and others 2011b) were collected from approximately 30 randomly selected animals per group that were serially sampled at different ages (Table 1). Nasal swabs (Copan, Italy) were collected at weaning (21 days), halfway through the nursery period (49 days), at the end of the nursery period (74 days), halfway through the fattening period (136 days) and prior to slaughter (200 days).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible that due to coincidence a lower number of positive animals was detected than the animals that were really infected with M. hyopneumoniae, although the samples were taken at random. Nasal swabs were collected, as it is safer for the researchers and less stressful for the animals than taking tracheal swabs (Thacker, 2004;Fablet et al, 2010). However, nasal swabs are less sensitive to detect DNA of M. hyopneumoniae than tracheal swab or BALf.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of nasal sampling used in this study was previously described by Fablet et al (2010) with some modifications. Both nasal cavities of each pig were swabbed with sterilized swabs that were inserted into the nostrils by rotation to reach deep into the turbinates.…”
Section: Nasal Swab Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%