1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02540471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the sharma constant and thermoacoustic properties of vegetable oils

Abstract: The density and volume of four Indian edible vegetable oils, sunflower, rice bran, groundnut and coconut, and one Indian nonedible oil, castor oil, have been experimentally determined. The values obtained were used to estimate the volume expansivity a, hence the thermoacoustic parameters, such as the Sharma constant S~ the isochoric temperature coefficient of internal pressure ~] v, the isochoric temperature coefficient of volume expansion Jr, reduced volume I~, reduced compressibility ~ and the Huggins parame… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Linoleic acid has a lower molar mass and degree of unsaturation than the oleic acid, a lower specific volume [17], and thus a lower contribution to the specific volume of SO than the oleic acid of OO. A quantitative comparison with previous measurements at atmospheric pressure [18][19][20] and extrapolated from high pressure [21] is illustrated in Figure 1. The values for the SO were close to those measured in [18] between −20 and +80 • C: the absolute difference was less than 9 × 10 −7 m 3 kg −1 below 20 • C and less than 7 × 10 −6 m 3 kg −1 above.…”
Section: Specific Volumementioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Linoleic acid has a lower molar mass and degree of unsaturation than the oleic acid, a lower specific volume [17], and thus a lower contribution to the specific volume of SO than the oleic acid of OO. A quantitative comparison with previous measurements at atmospheric pressure [18][19][20] and extrapolated from high pressure [21] is illustrated in Figure 1. The values for the SO were close to those measured in [18] between −20 and +80 • C: the absolute difference was less than 9 × 10 −7 m 3 kg −1 below 20 • C and less than 7 × 10 −6 m 3 kg −1 above.…”
Section: Specific Volumementioning
confidence: 97%
“…A quantitative comparison with previous measurements at atmospheric pressure [18][19][20] and extrapolated from high pressure [21] is illustrated in Figure 1. The values for the SO were close to those measured in [18] between −20 and +80 • C: the absolute difference was less than 9 × 10 −7 m 3 kg −1 below 20 • C and less than 7 × 10 −6 m 3 kg −1 above. The deviation with the data of [19] grew systematically with temperature, reaching 1 × 10 −5 m 3 kg −1 at 60 • C. For OO, the absolute difference with the data of [20] between 30 and 90 • C was not more than 4 × 10 −6 m 3 kg −1 and not more than 7 × 10 −7 m 3 kg −1 with the data of [21] between 30 and 60 • C. Deviations from the model could be attributed to slightly different compositions of the oils, to experimental uncertainties of each measuring methods (conventional dilatometer or pycnometer in the literature vs. oscillating U-tube in this work) and to a lower accuracy of temperature control.…”
Section: Specific Volumementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Halvorsen et al state that the results of Equation 3 predict density data within an average absolute deviation of 0.14%, as compared to 0.16% for the Lund equation. Experimental liquid viscosity data have been shown to generally follow the well-known Andrade equation: [8] where η is the viscosity and T is the absolute temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In previous work (12), o~ was calculated from volume and density measurements as functions of temperature at intervals of 10 K. V 2 and V 1 are the molar volumes at temperature T 2 and T 1, respectively.…”
Section: Isochoric Temperature Coefficient Of Internal Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%