Estudio de la relación entre las verbalizaciones motivadoras y el seguimiento de instrucciones en la terapia psicológica

Verdú, Ricardo de Pascual; Sánchez, Carolina Trujillo

doi:10.5093/cc2018a11

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, in total success Socratic questioning fragments, training in reasoning rules tended to appear together with motivating verbalizations that pointed out the consequences that such verbal behaviour will have. These results are consistent with findings from other studies in which it was found that following instructions was more likely when instructions and establishment operations were given together (De Pascual Verdú and Trujillo Sánchez, 2018;Marchena-Giráldez et al, 2013). On the other hand, in the present study it was not found that such sequencing discriminates patients' VAT, or any other type.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

What works in the Socratic debate? An analysis of verbal behaviour interaction during cognitive restructuring

Cebrián

Calero-Elvira

Guerrero-Escagedo

et al. 2020

Behav. Cogn. Psychother.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Cognitive restructuring is one of the most complex application procedures in psychotherapy. It is widely used by psychologists from different orientations. However, the guidelines on how to apply it do not usually have empirical evidence and there is a lack of knowledge about the mechanisms of change that explain it. Aims: The analysis of verbalizations that therapists emit during the Socratic method could help to better understand the functioning and strategies of effective debates. Method: In this study, specific verbal interaction sequences were analysed using observational methodology. The sample consisted of 113 Socratic questioning fragments belonging to 18 clinical cases, treated by behavioural therapists. Results: Among other findings, it was found that using questioning together with certain previous verbalizations directed the client’s response more effectively and those successful debates were characterized by using the aversive component in a frequent and contingent way. Conclusion: This study shows the most effective way to establish such an interaction in the Socratic method (following a style closer to Ellis’s argumentative debate), which entails relevant practical applications in therapy.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

What works in the Socratic debate? An analysis of verbal behaviour interaction during cognitive restructuring

Cebrián

Calero-Elvira

Guerrero-Escagedo

et al. 2020

Behav. Cogn. Psychother.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Regarding the limitations of the study, the sample is the first thing to comment on. The size of it was smaller than previous studies of the therapeutic process (i.e., Ruiz-Sancho et al, 2015), although at the same time it was a bit larger than specific studies of verbal MOs (de Pascual-Verdú & Trujillo-Sánchez, 2018). The number of sessions selected was because all cases must have sessions with all the clinically relevant activities, and due to different reasons, not all cases recorded had them.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Analysis of the role of motivating operations in the therapeutic verbal interaction

Estal-Muñoz,

Andrés-López,

Pereira

et al. 2023

An. psicol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The concept of motivating operation (MO) helps to overcome both theoretical and practical problems of the traditional notion of motivation in the study of the therapeutic process. In this research, the role of three types of therapists’ verbalizations with an MO function was analyzed, in addition to their association with clients’ verbal behavior. For this purpose, recordings of 40 clinical sessions belonging to 9 different cases were observed. The ACOVEO System was the observational category system used to identify the therapists’ verbal MOs coded as MO with clinical information, MO with consequences, and MO with pairings. The SISC-CVC was the one used to identify clients’ verbalizations coded as Agreement and Disagreement. Sequential analyses were performed to test the relation between the three different types of MOs with themselves, as well as with clients’ concurrence. Results showed that the different MOs were emitted in chunks and when MO with clinical information was uttered either with MO with consequences or MO with pairings there was a greater association with Agreement (r = 2.47; r = 1.86) rather than with Disagreement (r = -.53; r = -.36). These findings highlight the importance of the emission of MOs that associate directly events with an eliciting component with clients’ behavior, giving more efficacious strategies to the therapists El concepto de operación motivadora (OM) ayuda a suplir los problemas de la noción tradicional de motivación en el estudio del proceso terapéutico. En este trabajo, se analizó el rol de tres tipos de verbalizaciones del terapeuta con una función de OM y se comprobó su relación con el comportamiento verbal de los clientes. Para tal propósito, se observaron grabaciones de 40 sesiones de terapia pertenecientes a 9 casos diferentes. El Sistema ACOVEO fue el sistema de categorías empleado para identificar las categorías OM con información clínica, OM con consecuencias y OM con emparejamiento. El SISC-CVC fue aquel utilizado para identificar las verbalizaciones de las clientes codificadas como Acuerdo y Desacuerdo. Se llevaron a cabo análisis secuenciales para comprobar la relación entre las diferentes OMs entre ellas y con el acuerdo del cliente. Los resultados mostraron que las diferentes OMs fueron emitidas en bloque y que cuando la categoría OM con información clínica se emitía con OM con consecuencias o con OM con emparejamiento se encontraba una mayor asociación con la categoría de Acuerdo (r = 2.47; r = 1.86) que con la de Desacuerdo (r = -.53; r = -.36). Estos resultados destacan la importancia de la emisión de OMs que asocian de manera directa el comportamiento del cliente con eventos con un componente elicitador, ofreciendo estrategias más eficaces para los terapeutas.

show abstract

Saber qué y saber cómo. Una propuesta explicativa de tres técnicas terapéuticas empíricamente validadas

González-Terrazas

Froxán‐Parga

2021

Clínica Contemporánea

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumen: La eficacia demostrada de algunos procedimientos terapéuticos no siempre va seguida de una explicación coherente de su funcionalidad. En este artículo nos proponemos revisar tres de las estrategias terapéuticas más utilizadas en la actualidad: reestructuración cognitiva, defusión cognitiva y mindfulness, ofreciendo una explicación alternativa a las terapias tradicionales, partiendo de su definición como mayoritariamente verbales. La consideración de la cognición como una conducta cualitativamente diferente a cualquier otra conducta humana implica caer en una forma de pensar dualista que poco tiene que ofrecer al desarrollo científico de la psicología. Nuestra propuesta adopta un enfoque monista, basado en procesos de aprendizaje respondiente y operante, dentro de una tradición de análisis conductual. Se considera que las técnicas citadas operan sobre el comportamiento privado pero no difieren ontológicamente del público y, por tanto, están sujetas a contingencias en el proceso terapéutico de forma similar a cualquier otro comportamiento. Palabras clave: reestructuración cognitiva, defusión cognitiva, mindfulness, perspectiva analítico-conductual. Saber qué y saber cómo. Una propuesta explicativa de tres técnicas terapéuticas empíricamente validadas Knowing What and How. An Explicative Proposal for Three Empirically Validated Therapeutical Techniques Raymundo González-Terrazas https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4052-7109 es psicólogo en ITECOC,

show abstract

Estudio de la relación entre las verbalizaciones motivadoras y el seguimiento de instrucciones en la terapia psicológica

Cited by 3 publications

References 22 publications

What works in the Socratic debate? An analysis of verbal behaviour interaction during cognitive restructuring

What works in the Socratic debate? An analysis of verbal behaviour interaction during cognitive restructuring

Analysis of the role of motivating operations in the therapeutic verbal interaction

Saber qué y saber cómo. Una propuesta explicativa de tres técnicas terapéuticas empíricamente validadas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About