2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethanol production using Zymomonas mobilis: Development of a kinetic model describing glucose and xylose co-fermentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Saccharomyces cerevisiae is also commonly used in ethanol fermentations of sorghum grains 3,26,30,32 . Among the bacteria, mesophilic Zymomonas mobilis is considered as an alternative to yeast for ethanol fermentation 33–36 . The benefits of using Z. mobilis for ethanol production compared to yeast include a higher productivity in continuous fermentation systems, a higher ethanol yield per unit of sugar consumed, ethanol production three to five times faster per cell, and a higher glucose uptake rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Saccharomyces cerevisiae is also commonly used in ethanol fermentations of sorghum grains 3,26,30,32 . Among the bacteria, mesophilic Zymomonas mobilis is considered as an alternative to yeast for ethanol fermentation 33–36 . The benefits of using Z. mobilis for ethanol production compared to yeast include a higher productivity in continuous fermentation systems, a higher ethanol yield per unit of sugar consumed, ethanol production three to five times faster per cell, and a higher glucose uptake rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,26,30,32 Among the bacteria, mesophilic Zymomonas mobilis is considered as an alternative to yeast for ethanol fermentation. [33][34][35][36] The benefits of using Z. mobilis for ethanol production compared to yeast include a higher productivity in continuous fermentation systems, a higher ethanol yield per unit of sugar consumed, ethanol production three to five times faster per cell, and a higher glucose uptake rate. In addition, these bacteria do not need controlled doses of oxygen to maintain proper vitality and adequate cell concentration, and they have shown the ability to grow in a completely anaerobic environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the complexity of intracellular metabolism and the lack of metabolic data increase the difficulty of intracellular kinetic modeling, which is not conducive to the dynamic analysis of large-scale metabolic networks. 22,23 For these reasons, dynamic flux balance analysis (DFBA) [24][25][26] can make up for the shortcomings of flux balance analysis and kinetic models. The genome-scale metabolism (GSM) model of C. butyricum iCbu641 16 can be used to analyze the metabolic mechanism of C. butyricum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional kinetic models can only rely on extracellular measurable metabolite data to identify model parameters. However, the complexity of intracellular metabolism and the lack of metabolic data increase the difficulty of intracellular kinetic modeling, which is not conducive to the dynamic analysis of large‐scale metabolic networks 22,23 . For these reasons, dynamic flux balance analysis (DFBA) 24–26 can make up for the shortcomings of flux balance analysis and kinetic models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as ethanol production (Díaz & Willis, 2019;Srimachai, Nuithitikul, Sompong, Kongjan, & Panpong, 2015;van Zyl, van Rensburg, van Zyl, Harms, & Lynd, 2011), and environmental biotechnology systems such as nitrification (Leyva- Díaz, González-Martínez, González-López, Muñío, & Poyatos, 2015;Pambrun, Paul, & Spérandio, 2006). The reason may be that adding statistical analysis to the parameter's estimation is not always straightforward, and normally some advanced numerical methods must be applied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%