Ethical considerations related to participation and partnership: an investigation of stakeholders’ perceptions of an action-research project on user fee removal for the poorest in Burkina Faso

Abstract

BackgroundHealthcare user fees present an important barrier for accessing services for the poorest (indigents) in Burkina Faso and selective removal of fees has been incorporated in national healthcare planning. However, establishing fair, effective and sustainable mechanisms for the removal of user fees presents important challenges. A participatory action-research project was conducted in Ouargaye, Burkina Faso, to test mechanisms for identifying those who are indigents, and funding and implementing user fee removal. In this paper, we explore stakeholder perceptions of ethical considerations relating to participation and partnership arising in the action-research.MethodsWe conducted 39 in-depth interviews to examine ethical issues associated with the action-research. Respondents included 14 individuals identified as indigent through the community selection process, seven members of village selection committees, six local healthcare professionals, five members of the management committees of local health clinics, five members of the research team, and four regional or national policy-makers. Using constant comparative techniques, we carried out an inductive thematic analysis of the collected data.ResultsThe Ouargaye project involved a participatory model, included both implementation and research components, and focused on a vulnerable group within small, rural communities. Stakeholder perceptions and experiences relating to the participatory approach and reliance on multiple partnerships in the project were associated with a range of ethical considerations related to 1) seeking common ground through communication and collaboration, 2) community participation and risk of stigmatization, 3) impacts of local funding of the user fee removal, 4) efforts to promote fairness in the selection of the indigents, and 5) power relations and the development of partnerships.ConclusionsThis investigation of the Ouargaye project serves to illuminate the distinctive ethical terrain of a participatory public health action-research project. In carrying out such projects, careful attention and effort is needed to establish and maintain respectful relationships amongst those involved, acknowledge and address differences of power and position, and evaluate burdens and risks for individuals and groups.

Motivations and expectations driving community participation in entomological research projects: Target Malaria as a case study in Bana, Western Burkina Faso

“…Unfortunately, these studies provide limited information on the factors that motivate local communities to become actively involved in these interventions, and the question of which particular expectations and considerations drive public participation remains as a result underinvestigated. The scant information available is often limited to practical aspects of local participation [25][26][27] or to the ethical dimensions of individual and community recruitment [28]. Data pertaining to clinical research projects is of limited value in this case, as the expectation of an immediate and direct personal health bene t may in principle play a less prominent role in the willingness to participate in entomological research projects [29,30].…”

Health financing policies in Sub-Saharan Africa: government ownership or donors’ influence? A scoping review of policymaking processes

“…Ownership, defined as “an attitude of accepting responsibility for something and taking control of how it develops” [ 22 ], can yield positive results. For instance, it can aid in eliminating barriers to access to care [ 23 ]. The mixed results achieved by these policies may be attributable to their “top-down” nature, reflecting the possibility that donor-driven policies do not necessarily fit local contexts [ 24 ], and therefore lack buy-in from governments.…”

Ethics and Community-Based Rehabilitation: Eight Ethical Questions from a Review of the Literature

“…As has been discussed for community-based and action research, several factors support the development of effective partnerships even when partners have divergent backgrounds and roles: mutual trust, attention to the privilege and position of each partner, humility, acknowledgement of different viewpoints, and a commitment to solidarity. 64–66 These considerations are equally relevant in the CBR context, including the development of what Iris Marion Young has termed asymmetrical reciprocity, which entails recognizing the situated realities of partners, including the asymmetries of life experience, worldview, and opportunity while embodying the commitment to mutual respect, trust, and consideration. 67(p.49) Enhanced attention to one's presuppositions, power, and privilege can help support effective partnerships in CBR.…”