2010
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncq304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EURADOS intercomparison on measurements and Monte Carlo modelling for the assessment of americium in a USTUR leg phantom

Abstract: A collaboration of the EURADOS working group on 'Internal Dosimetry' and the United States Transuranium and Uranium Registries (USTUR) has taken place to carry out an intercomparison on measurements and Monte Carlo modelling determining americium deposited in the bone of a USTUR leg phantom. Preliminary results and conclusions of this intercomparison exercise are presented here.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, numerical calibration techniques may be applied. Mathematical software combines voxel phantoms and Monte Carlo statistical simulations to model photon transport from the phantom and the detection of photons by a simulated detector (Franck et al., 2003; Hunt et al., 2003; Gómez-Ros et al., 2007; Lopez et al., 2011a). The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA, 1996) and the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU, 2002) have given guidance on the direct measurement of body content of radionuclides.…”
Section: Methods Of Individual and Workplace Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, numerical calibration techniques may be applied. Mathematical software combines voxel phantoms and Monte Carlo statistical simulations to model photon transport from the phantom and the detection of photons by a simulated detector (Franck et al., 2003; Hunt et al., 2003; Gómez-Ros et al., 2007; Lopez et al., 2011a). The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA, 1996) and the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU, 2002) have given guidance on the direct measurement of body content of radionuclides.…”
Section: Methods Of Individual and Workplace Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, numerical calibration techniques may be applied. Mathematical software combines voxel phantoms and Monte Carlo statistical simulations to model photon transport from the phantom and the detection of photons by a simulated detector (Franck et al, 2003;Hunt et al, 2003;Go´mez-Ros et al, 2007;Lopez et al, 2011a).…”
Section: Body Activity Measurements (In-vivo Measurements)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doses from intakes of radionuclides are estimated from monitoring data of activity in total/partial body and in excreta samples (urine and faeces) using biokinetic and dosimetric models and from assumptions about the pattern of intake and the properties of the radioactive material inside the body. Past intercomparison exercises (88,89) have shown a wide range in doses that can be obtained from the same data set from different assessors demonstrating the need for guidance on harmonising internal dose evaluations. Any actions required in this context must take into account the stateof-the-art tools currently available and forthcoming publications such as ICRP/OIR Reports (90) , revised IDEAS Guidelines for the Estimation of Committed Doses from Incorporation Monitoring Data (59) , ISO Standards in internal dosimetry (91) and the output of the TechRec project Technical Recommendations for Monitoring Individuals Occupationally Exposed to Internal Radiation currently being prepared for the EC by a consortium of EURADOS voting member institutions.…”
Section: Harmonisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, acquiring experimental data following the method employed here would be very difficult and tedious. Calculating the detector response with Monte Carlo methods was found to be reliable for welldefined experimental situations (Lamart et al, 2009;Lopez et al, 2011;Broggio et al, 2012). However, in the present case a very detailed model of the MUs would be necessary because of the significance of scattered radiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%