2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.109244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

European charophyte evolution across the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modern charophytes are typical inhabitants of freshwater (non‐marine) environments, but a few can tolerate some salinity, though they are not suited to grow in an open marine environment (Schubert, Marquardt, Schories, & Blindow, 2015; Vicente et al, 2019; Vicente, Expósito, et al, 2016; Vicente, Villalba‐Breva, et al, 2016; Villalba‐Breva & Martín‐Closas, 2011, 2013). They flourish in almost all inland waters, particularly in slow‐flowing rivers and streams, and lake and pond bottoms (temporary and permanent), and are able to live in sand and silt substrates, and marl‐rich lacustrine environments (Barbosa, Lefler, Berthold, & Laughinghouse, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Modern charophytes are typical inhabitants of freshwater (non‐marine) environments, but a few can tolerate some salinity, though they are not suited to grow in an open marine environment (Schubert, Marquardt, Schories, & Blindow, 2015; Vicente et al, 2019; Vicente, Expósito, et al, 2016; Vicente, Villalba‐Breva, et al, 2016; Villalba‐Breva & Martín‐Closas, 2011, 2013). They flourish in almost all inland waters, particularly in slow‐flowing rivers and streams, and lake and pond bottoms (temporary and permanent), and are able to live in sand and silt substrates, and marl‐rich lacustrine environments (Barbosa, Lefler, Berthold, & Laughinghouse, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Characeae family largely dominated the Late Cretaceous charophyte flora while clavatoraceans and porocharaceans become extinct close to the K-Pg boundary (Feist, Grambast-Fessard, et al, 2005;Feist, Liu, & Tafforeau, 2005;Grambast, 1974;Vicente et al, 2019).…”
Section: Palaeobiogeographical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the growing interest in the history of Lychnothamnus (Soulié‐Märsche, 1989; Musacchio, 2010; Vicente, Csiki‐Sava & Martín‐Closas, 2019), its fossil record is known only from a few sites covering parts of the Holocene period. For instance, Lychnothamnus gyrogonites were found in palaeolacustrine sediments in the central Sahara (Petit‐Maire & Riser, 1981), the Ganga Plain (India) sediments (Bhatia, 2006), and Lake Shkodra (Albania), where the disappearance of L. barbatus occurred approximately 1,300 cal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soulié-Märsche, 1989;Musacchio, 2010;Vicente, Csiki-Sava & Martín-Closas, 2019), its fossil record is known only from a few sites covering parts of the Holocene period. For instance, Lychnothamnus gyrogonites were found in palaeolacustrine sediments in the central Sahara(Petit-Maire & Riser, 1981), the…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9B, C), from the lower La Scoaba level; LPB (FGGUB) M.1699, incomplete left p4, anterior crown fragment, from the upper La Scoaba level. The M2 was found associated only with gastropod shell fragments and indeterminate bone chips, whereas the p4 is part of a richer microfossil assemblage, including characeans (Vicente et al, 2019), as well as gastropods, ostracods, and isolated amphibian remains (anurans, albanerpetontids), an assemblage that is still largely under study (see Csiki-Sava et al, 2016). The overall fossiliferous content of the La Scoaba succession was reviewed by Csiki-Sava et al (2016).…”
Section: Site Sp3mentioning
confidence: 99%