Evaluasi Program Ujian Nasional (Un) Pada SMK Negeri Di Jakarta Selatan

Abstract

This study aims to determine Evaluation Program of the National Examination (UN) in the State Vocational School in South Jakarta. This study includes qualitative research, where research in SMK who has the Office Administration Program in South Jakarta, which contained 10 SMKN. The resources are empirically Principal and Chairman of the Program Office Administration. Collecting data using the method of observation, interviews, documentation and archive footage, while the analysis of data using qualitative data analysis interactive model. The results showed that: (1) Implementation of UN 2015 went well, although there are still obstacles to the program, but this is normal and can be controlled quickly and well. (2) The 2015 UN Program is a pilot program, where this year the UN goal is to assess the achievement of national competency standards on a particular subject. (3) The results of the UN as a basis for mapping the quality of programs and or education units, consideration of selection into the next level of education and training as well as providing assistance to the education unit in its efforts to improve the quality of education, not as a determinant of graduation of students. (4) each learner formal education and non-formal education pathways equality eligible for the national exam and has the right to repeat the extent not otherwise meet the criteria of achievement of competence of graduates, and every student must attend one national exam at no charge.

Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Kristen Menggunakan Model Context, Input, Process, and Product

“…Menurut Henry Eryanto (Eryanto et al, 2016), evaluasi program ialah susunan kegiatan yang dikerjakan dengan terencana serta teliti guna mengenali tingkatan keterlaksanaan atau kesuksesan suatu program. Karena itu, program pembelajaran yang dirancang oleh guru demi tujuan yang akan dicapai, diketahui berhasil atau tidaknya tujuan program pembelajaran maka diperlukan evaluasi program pembelajaran.…”

Society’s Attitudes towards National Examination and Teacher’s Response to National Assessment

“…Therefore, from 2015 until 2019 as the latest National Examination held by the government, its function is changing, being a tool to drawing the quality of education in Indonesia. Various literature studies that have been conducted found that there is a controversy that occurs among the community related to the government policy in implementing the national examination, even among the policymaker [6]. The controversy is divided into two versions.…”

“…For the past five years, the government has continued to work on improving national examinations and developing the newest instrument of national examination using a computer equipped with specific software to display questions and answer processes with the same level of difficulty as paper-based national examination [8], which is known as UNBK 6 to reduce budgets and reduce fraud. It is right that UNBK implementation model directly or indirectly provides benefits, including saving duplication costs, facilitating the distribution of materials, quickly reaching all regions, high security, easy scoring process, and make it easier to print certificates of national examination results [9].…”

“…EBTANAS stands for Evaluasi Belajar Tahap Akhir Nasional, the term for naming the assessment used before it was named as UN5 UAN stands for Ujian Akhir Nasional, the term for naming the assessment used before it was named as UN6 UNBK stands for Ujian Nasional Berbasis Komputer or Computer-based national examination…”