Purpose: To gather input and perspectives from members of the Calgary Pelvic Health Physiotherapists' Community of Practice (PHPT CoP) to ensure common goals that help sustain and advance the group. Method: An online survey grounded in CoP theory was used to elicit feedback from 23 PHPTs. Descriptive statistics summarized survey results. Results: The response rate was 96%; all respondents worked in women's pelvic health. Respondents expressed interest in continuing regular face-to-face meetings, a speaker series, case studies, and connecting with other PHPTs. Conclusion: The findings suggest continuation of regular meetings, with a focus on clinical skill development, and an annual Alberta PHPT conference. Members of this community of practice seek a strategy to promote PHPT to the public and develop referral sources.Key Words: pelvic floor; survey.
RÉ SUMÉObjet : Ré unir des commentaires et des points de vue des membres du Collectif de pratique des physiothé rapeutes en santé pelvienne de Calgary (CdP PTSP) afin d'assurer que des buts communs aident à appuyer et à faire progresser leur groupe. Mé thode : On a utilisé un sondage en ligne reposant sur les thé ories du CdP afin de ré unir des commentaires de 23 physiothé rapeutes en santé pelvienne. Des statistiques descriptives ont ré sumé les ré sultats du sondage. Ré sultats : Le taux de ré ponse s'est é tabli à 96%. Tous les ré pondants travaillaient en santé pelvienne des femmes. Les ré pondants souhaitaient que l'on poursuive les ré unions en personne pé riodiques, organise une sé rie de confé rences, ré alise des é tudes de cas et é tablisse des contacts avec d'autres physiothé rapeutes en santé pelvienne. Conclusion : Les constatations indiquent qu'il vaudrait la peine de continuer à tenir des ré unions pé riodiques axé es sur le perfectionnement des techniques cliniques et de tenir un congrè s annuel des PTSP de l'Alberta. Les membres de ce collectif de pratique cherchent une straté gie pour promouvoir les PTSP auprè s de la population et cré er des sources d'aiguillage.The term community of practice (CoP) was coined by Lave and Wenger, 1 who believed that learning takes place in social relationships. A CoP allows for a collaborative form of social learning. 2 In Lave and Wenger's situated learning theory, adult learners discover and shape their knowledge within a CoP; 3 learning happens through imitation, visualization, and socialization. 2,3 Wenger and colleagues 2(p.4-5) defined a CoP as a group of people who share a concern, a set of problems, or a passion about a topic and who deepen their knowledge and expertise in this area by interacting on an ongoing basis. However they accumulate knowledge, they become informally bound by the value that they find in learning together. This value is not merely instrumental to their work. It also accrues in the personal satisfaction of knowing colleagues who understand each other's perspectives and of belonging to an interesting group of people. Over time, they develop a unique perspective on their topic a...