2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2015.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating classification and feature selection techniques for honeybee subspecies identification using wing images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Globally, many A. mellifera L. sub-species (up to 30) have been described in the literature (Ruttner 1988(Ruttner , 1992Hepburn and Radloff 1998;Bouga et al 2011;da Silva et al 2015). Sub-species are mainly classified based on various morphological characteristics, and more recently, molecular techniques have also been applied (Ruttner 1988;Meixner et al 2013).…”
Section: Honeybees Of Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, many A. mellifera L. sub-species (up to 30) have been described in the literature (Ruttner 1988(Ruttner , 1992Hepburn and Radloff 1998;Bouga et al 2011;da Silva et al 2015). Sub-species are mainly classified based on various morphological characteristics, and more recently, molecular techniques have also been applied (Ruttner 1988;Meixner et al 2013).…”
Section: Honeybees Of Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Honeybees live in different environments, such as mountainous, hilly areas, plains, dessert or wetlands and they are usually classified into about 30 subspecies (Leno da Silva, et al, 2015;Rinderer, 2008). Honeybees are grouped into four phylogenetic lines: A, C, M and O, each associated to a particular geographical area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wings are considered the most reliable morphological structure for insect identification; the evaluation of wing morphology being also recommended for the identification of honey bees. In the last years, the measurements of the fore wings have proven to be reliable for the c 1 lassification of honeybees (Leno da Silva et al, 2015). Even though differences between species are much more important than the intra-species ones, the intra-species variation is large enough to discriminate the bee subspecies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis of known research related to the measurement of morphological characteristics of bees shows that appropriate methods for this purpose are the following (El-Aw et al, 2012;Silvaa et al, 2015):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%