2016
DOI: 10.1007/s41324-016-0053-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating co-relationship between OCO-2 XCO2 and in situ CO2 measured with portable equipment in Seoul

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GOSAT fossil-fuel CO 2 flux provides CO 2 emissions in terms of locations of CO 2 sources and provides a measure of the direct exchange of CO 2 between in situ CO 2 sources and the atmosphere over CO 2 sources located within an area. [13,14]. Thereby, the satellite-based fossil-fuel CO 2 flux has the advantage of monitoring and comparing the average flux from the CO 2 sources located in heterogeneous countries because the satellite measures the CO 2 flux all over the world with the same standardized method and unit.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Gosat Fossil-fuel Co 2 Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GOSAT fossil-fuel CO 2 flux provides CO 2 emissions in terms of locations of CO 2 sources and provides a measure of the direct exchange of CO 2 between in situ CO 2 sources and the atmosphere over CO 2 sources located within an area. [13,14]. Thereby, the satellite-based fossil-fuel CO 2 flux has the advantage of monitoring and comparing the average flux from the CO 2 sources located in heterogeneous countries because the satellite measures the CO 2 flux all over the world with the same standardized method and unit.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Gosat Fossil-fuel Co 2 Fluxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An in situ CO 2 density survey was carried out at the specific time (11-13 h) and season (08.01-09.30.2018), during which photosynthetic activity and plant growth are vigorous and the atmosphere is stable after the rainy season. (2,10) Wind velocity strongly affects the accuracy of CO 2 measurement. (12) It is essential to validate the CO 2 measurement accuracy by comparing the wind speed measurements between portable instruments and standardized wind measurements at national meteorological telemetry stations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in velocity between the in situ data and the national meteorological telemetry station data was 1.3 m/s, showing a deviation similar to those in previous studies. (2,13) We selected the measurement points (182 points) ( Fig. 3) that show different normalized difference vegetation indexes (NDVIs) to explore the topographical above-ground biomass in terms of the CO 2 uptake and the capability of the above-ground biomass.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is quite difficult to obtain the spatial resolution required to evaluate cool roofing performance of individual buildings occupying approximately 5 to 10 square meters by utilizing traditional satellite images (e.g., LANDSAT and MODIS) taken at an altitude of 700 km or more [23] and the authors had written extensively about these elsewhere [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. In the case of buildings in urban areas, using aerial photography to investigate cool roofing performance is virtually impossible because of the densely populated area, where there is legal regulation prohibiting low-altitude flight of manned aircraft.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%