2017
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.1936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating functional recovery of habitat for threatened woodland caribou

Abstract: Abstract. Habitat restoration is a core element for the recovery of many declining species. In western Canada, habitat restoration for the recovery of woodland caribou is focused on linear features (LFs) created by oil and gas exploration. At present, the only established criterion for LF restoration is when vegetation structure on LFs is similar to surrounding vegetation. Human-mediated habitat alteration impacts caribou population dynamics by increasing caribou predation rates in two ways: increasing alterna… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
12
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, numerous studies have found that the dense linear features (oil and gas seismic lines) and road networks that characterize managed forest landscapes improve the mobility of predators (James and Stuart‐Smith , Dickie et al. ) and the encounter probabilities with prey (Whittington et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Third, numerous studies have found that the dense linear features (oil and gas seismic lines) and road networks that characterize managed forest landscapes improve the mobility of predators (James and Stuart‐Smith , Dickie et al. ) and the encounter probabilities with prey (Whittington et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Dickie et al. ). We tackle these two hypotheses in a non‐mutually exclusive perspective (sensu Quinn and Dunham ) given that they can both contribute to our understanding of the behavioral plasticity of boreal populations of woodland caribou toward open habitats and its consequences throughout its distribution range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameterization (using package 'circular'; Agostinelli & Lund, ) was done based on 'moving' steps only. Moving steps were defined as >20.53 m for wolves and >25.86 m for bears (based on a broken‐stick analysis following the methods of Dickie, Serrouya, Demars, et al, ), and >16 m (collar error; Dickie, ) for moose and caribou because the result of their broken‐stick analysis revealed a breakpoint occurring below collar error.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Movement was evaluated as functions of habitat attributes along each step, that is if the step was on undisturbed forest (the reference category) compared to anthropogenic LFs, polygonal disturbances and riparian habitat. Observed and random steps were classified as being on anthropogenic LFs or polygonal disturbances if both the start and end points were closer than, or equal to, the buffered width of each feature (transmission lines‐37m; high‐grade roads and railways‐30m; pipelines‐20m; low‐grade roads and ice roads‐12m; conventional seismic‐10m; and low‐impact seismic‐7m) following the methods of Dickie, Serrouya, Demars, et al (). If a step was contained within the buffer of multiple anthropogenic LF classes, that step was assigned to the anthropogenic LF class with the largest width.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation