2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Landsat 8 evapotranspiration for water use mapping in the Colorado River Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
98
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
8
98
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar ET c maps at a field scale for agricultural crops including corn were reported by Farg et al [32], Zipper and Loheide [62], and Senay et al [63], they reported minimum and maximum ET c values at different crop growth stages, where the higher evapotranspiration rates were found at the mid-season growth stage and lowest evapotranspiration rates were found at early growth stage. that in those particular stages farmers can save irrigation water (grey wide column in the graph), because in those stages the crop needs small water requirements, due to the fact that the crop canopy is no yet fully developed.…”
Section: Et C Maps At a Field Scalesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Similar ET c maps at a field scale for agricultural crops including corn were reported by Farg et al [32], Zipper and Loheide [62], and Senay et al [63], they reported minimum and maximum ET c values at different crop growth stages, where the higher evapotranspiration rates were found at the mid-season growth stage and lowest evapotranspiration rates were found at early growth stage. that in those particular stages farmers can save irrigation water (grey wide column in the graph), because in those stages the crop needs small water requirements, due to the fact that the crop canopy is no yet fully developed.…”
Section: Et C Maps At a Field Scalesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…So, the SNR of Landsat 8 OLI is 6 to 10 times better than that of Landsat 7 ETM+ for the different spectral bands, which has allowed narrowing down of its spectral bandwidths to avoid atmospheric absorption to the reflected wave from water bodies [61,62]. An additional cirrus band of Landsat 8 (1.36-1.38 µm) and Sentinel-2 (1.365-1.385 µm) can be used to detect clouds, which is especially helpful for detecting high altitude clouds [62][63][64][65]. Some water indices were defined to be calculated by the surface reflectance data of each band, so the original TOA reflectance data needs to conduct atmospheric corrections to be converted into surface reflectance data, to remove the impacts of several factors such as atmospheric gases and aerosols in space.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Sensors In Water Body Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sentinel-2 twin satellites offered better spatial resolution (10-20-60 m versus 30 m), and better temporal resolution (5 days versus 16 days), compared with Landsat 8. However, the thermal bands of Landsat 8 does provided land surface temperature information [81] that was not available from Sentinel-2, and therefore, in cotton stem water potential estimation, Landsat imagery is still extremely valuable [82]. The surface temperature information and the surface reflectance information may provide different observing angles to detect cotton water status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%