2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the application of the dual path platform VetTB test for badgers (Meles meles) in the test and vaccinate or remove (TVR) wildlife research intervention project in Northern Ireland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the sensitivity of the DPP for use in badgers during the TVR study has recently been quoted as 42% (95% 0.24–0.66) [24] (and the specificity as 89% (95% CI 86–92%), [24]), there is a possibility that the number of DPP positive badgers, and therefore culled badgers, is low due to non-perfect sensitivity. However, as the performance of the DPP VetTB test is comparable to established laboratory tests for M. bovis , it is therefore an appropriate method to use under field circumstances [24]. Further consideration needs to be given to whether the DPP test can differentiate between natural exposure to M. bovis and previous vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As the sensitivity of the DPP for use in badgers during the TVR study has recently been quoted as 42% (95% 0.24–0.66) [24] (and the specificity as 89% (95% CI 86–92%), [24]), there is a possibility that the number of DPP positive badgers, and therefore culled badgers, is low due to non-perfect sensitivity. However, as the performance of the DPP VetTB test is comparable to established laboratory tests for M. bovis , it is therefore an appropriate method to use under field circumstances [24]. Further consideration needs to be given to whether the DPP test can differentiate between natural exposure to M. bovis and previous vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is important for informing on the development of future bTB intervention strategies. The non-significant impact of a TVR approach on badger ranging behaviour, alongside the previously described logistics of a large-scale TVR intervention [20] and the feasibility of the DPP test [24], gives a holistic overview of the suitability of TVR as a wildlife-related bTB intervention option. By providing an alternative to culling all captured badgers, and inevitably healthy ones, TVR is a wildlife intervention option that should be considered for future research using replication and control areas in order to verify the current findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From 2015-2018, DPP positive badgers were humanely euthanized and DPP-negative badgers were vaccinated using injectable Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG), and released (Menzies et al 2021). Culled badgers underwent post-mortem examination according to a standardised protocol (Courcier et al 2020) and specified tissues were submitted for bacteriological culture.…”
Section: Sampling Of Cattle and Badgersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P22 ELISA has provided high levels of sensitivity in previous studies in badgers [ 26 ]. Other available serological tests for diagnosing TB in badgers [ 28 ], e.g., the DPP Vet TB, the BrockTB STAT-PAK, and the chemiluminescent multiplex ELISA system have shown low-to-moderate sensitivity (from 30.77% to 58%) in naturally infected badgers [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. P22 is mainly composed of MPB70 and MPB83, but there are other proteins shared with MAC or other non-tuberculous mycobacteria with a high sequence similarity to MPB70 and MPB83 [ 34 ]; that is why the cut-off is advisable to specifically define for each epidemiological situation [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%