2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the causes of cost reduction in photovoltaic modules

Abstract: Evaluating the causes of cost reduction in photovoltaic modules The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Kavlak, Goksin et al. "Evaluating the causes of cost reduction in photovoltaic modules."

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
195
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 313 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
195
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Contact formation on a silicon solar cell is the second most expensive processing step after wafer manufacturing. [1][2][3] Although there are different metallization techniques, [4][5][6][7][8] by far screen-printed Ag front contact is the most cost-effective, simple, mature, and of higher throughput. [9][10][11] The Ag front gridlines should be narrow (less than 30 μm) to minimize the shading loss so that the short circuit current (J SC ), fill factor (FF), and hence the conversion efficiency can be high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contact formation on a silicon solar cell is the second most expensive processing step after wafer manufacturing. [1][2][3] Although there are different metallization techniques, [4][5][6][7][8] by far screen-printed Ag front contact is the most cost-effective, simple, mature, and of higher throughput. [9][10][11] The Ag front gridlines should be narrow (less than 30 μm) to minimize the shading loss so that the short circuit current (J SC ), fill factor (FF), and hence the conversion efficiency can be high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most government efforts to support production decarbonization have been through investment and tax credits to offset the costs and risks of investment in innovative technologies, as well as direct research, development and some piloting, for example, the US Advanced Research Projects Agency programs (e.g., ARPA‐Energy), or the European Union Ultra‐low CO 2 Steelmaking (UCLOS) and H2020 programs. Arguably, these programs have been pivotal to keystone technological advancements, such as solar photovoltaics (Kavlak, McNerney, & Trancik, ). These programs, while necessary and successful in generating technologies, do not, however, necessarily bridge the commercialization “valley of death.” Transformative technological change is more likely to succeed with transition plans involving most if not all supply chain actors (e.g., government, basic materials producers, finance suppliers, manufacturers, and retailers).…”
Section: Policy Package Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utility‐scale PV market is extremely competitive, and the appearance of a new entrant in the near future will be very challenging, especially in view of consistently dropping pricings offered by c‐Si . Publicly and privately funded research and development (R&D) efforts, market‐stimulating policies, and scale economies (dominant factor after 2001) have been driving the cost reduction, making PV the cheapest source of energy today . It is certainly a valuable lesson how to create a new technology affordable.…”
Section: Maturity Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%