Evaluating the Cost, Safety, and Proliferation Risks of Small Floating Nuclear Reactors

Abstract

It is hard to see how our energy system can be decarbonized if the world abandons nuclear power, but equally hard to introduce the technology in nonnuclear energy states. This is especially true in countries with limited technical, institutional, and regulatory capabilities, where safety and proliferation concerns are acute. Given the need to achieve serious emissions mitigation by mid-century, and the multidecadal effort required to develop robust nuclear governance institutions, we must look to other models that might facilitate nuclear plant deployment while mitigating the technology's risks. One such deployment paradigm is the build-own-operate-return model. Because returning small land-based reactors containing spent fuel is infeasible, we evaluate the cost, safety, and proliferation risks of a system in which small modular reactors are manufactured in a factory, and then deployed to a customer nation on a floating platform. This floating small modular reactor would be owned and operated by a single entity and returned unopened to the developed state for refueling. We developed a decision model that allows for a comparison of floating and land-based alternatives considering key International Atomic Energy Agency plant-siting criteria. Abandoning onsite refueling is beneficial, and floating reactors built in a central facility can potentially reduce the risk of cost overruns and the consequences of accidents. However, if the floating platform must be built to military-grade specifications, then the cost would be much higher than a land-based system. The analysis tool presented is flexible, and can assist planners in determining the scope of risks and uncertainty associated with different deployment options.

Legal Regulations of Floating Nuclear Power Plants: problems and prospects

“…Many countries including Great Britain, France, and the USA have indicated interest in developing TNPPs including FNPPs. Currently, there are about 20 different innovative reactor concepts in small and medium sized categories at different stages of design and development worldwide 3 . Some schemes have already been used: in the 1960-70s, "a ship known as the Sturgis outfitted with a nuclear reactor was used to power the lock system of the Panama Canal" 4 .…”

Research on risk assessment method of energy system based on data mining

“…The objective function is solved to obtain the risk assessment model of energy system (Yan et al, 2016;Ford et al, 2017):…”

New Methods for Evaluating Energy Infrastructure Development Risks

“…On the other end, there is a new arrangement called BOO, in which a technology developer finances, builds, owns, and operates a power plant—effectively transforming the electric utility from an infrastructure owner to a land provider or power purchaser. This latter model might be especially attractive to smaller or poorer nations that have primary resources like land and a desire for greater electric‐generating capacity to fuel expanding economies but do not have the technical, financial, or institutional capabilities to develop systems like nuclear power plants (Abdulla & Morgan, 2015; Ford, Abdulla, & Morgan, 2017).…”