2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32909-8_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Impact of Categorical Data Encoding and Scaling on Neural Network Classification Performance: The Case of Repeat Consumption of Identical Cultural Goods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, note that we often lose information with respect to the original data when applying preprocessing methods for deep neural networks, leading to a reduction in predictive performance (Fitkov-Norris et al, 2012). 4.…”
Section: Missing or Complex Irregular Spatial Dependenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, note that we often lose information with respect to the original data when applying preprocessing methods for deep neural networks, leading to a reduction in predictive performance (Fitkov-Norris et al, 2012). 4.…”
Section: Missing or Complex Irregular Spatial Dependenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our methods to several baselines. The first set of baselines consists of different encoding schemes for ordinal data (Kurczynski 1970;Boriah, Chandola, and Kumar 2008;Fitkov-Norris, Vahid, and Hand 2012), and the remaining ones are methods specially designed for measuring similarities on ordinal data (Podani 1999). All these baseline algorithms are summarized below:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even for variables with an inherent order, it leads to many similar binary encodings (i.e. encodings that agree for many of the bits) for semantically very different categorical values (Fitkov-Norris et al, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%