2016 International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/fit.2016.7857539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the quality of e-learning using consistent fuzzy preference relations method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding contradicts previous studies suggesting that content quality is the least crucial factor in e-learning's postadoption (Garg & Jain, 2017;Hwang et al, 2004;Lin et al, 2014). However, this finding is in line with prior studies that verify that content quality is an important factor influencing the postadoption of e-learning (Choi & Jeong, 2019;Iryanti et al, 2016;Jain et al, 2016;Jie, 2010;Su et al, 2016). The rationale is that university lecturers perceive that good content quality motivates learners to use e-learning for learning activities.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This finding contradicts previous studies suggesting that content quality is the least crucial factor in e-learning's postadoption (Garg & Jain, 2017;Hwang et al, 2004;Lin et al, 2014). However, this finding is in line with prior studies that verify that content quality is an important factor influencing the postadoption of e-learning (Choi & Jeong, 2019;Iryanti et al, 2016;Jain et al, 2016;Jie, 2010;Su et al, 2016). The rationale is that university lecturers perceive that good content quality motivates learners to use e-learning for learning activities.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…This study is believed to be among the first few studies that modified the D&M model by including another four factors, which are learners' characteristics, instructors' characteristics, user interface and learning community. For instance, some studies integrated learners' characteristic and instructors' characteristics in the D&M model (Ozkan & Koseler, 2009;Xaymoungkhoun et al, 2012;Yassine et al, 2017), while some other studies included user interface and learning community in the D&M model (Abdellatief et al, 2010;Choi & Jeong, 2019;Farid et al, 2018;Iryanti et al, 2016).…”
Section: Implication Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Choshanov (Choshanov, 2013), the teacher should be able to choose and develop their own assessment methods that meet the goals and content of education, use assessment data to improve teaching, and motivate students to learn. Problems of assessing the quality of e-learning tools are highlighted in (Alkhattabi et al, 2011;Atanasova, 2019;Bilousova and Zhyteneva, 2014;Elumalai et al, 2019;Ginns and Ellis, 2009;Hay et al, 2008;Iryanti and Pandiya, 2017;Kazaine, 2017;Khalid and Ziden, 2016;Leontiev et al, 2020;Little, 2003;Lytvynova, 2013;Lundqvist et al, 2006;Male and Pattinson, 2011;Marković and Jovanović, 2012;Marshall, 2012;Pons et al, 2015;Robert et al, 2016;Stasiecka et al, 2005Stasiecka et al, , 2006Vasconcelos et al, 2020;Wu and Lin, 2012;Yang et al, 2007;. In particular, Lytvynova (Lytvynova, 2013) notes that expert activity is undergoing a stage of formation, gradually becoming commonplace, and the relevance of research in the field of examination of electronic educational resources is associated with the trend of standardization and systematization of electronic educational content.…”
Section: Recent Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salah satu alasannya karena terlalu banyaknya penilaian yang harus ditentukan. Untuk mencegah ketidakkonsistenan tersebut, maka dalam penentuan penilaian dalam penelitian ini, yang akan dilakukan oleh seorang akademisi dalam bidang regulasi telekomunikasi, akan digunakan metode Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relations (CFPR) (Iryanti & Pandiya, 2017). Metode ini akan meminimalisasi jumlah penilaian yang harus diberikan oleh pengambil keputusan.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified