Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2000.926852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the quantitative effects of workflow systems based on real cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of processes studied across all the organizations totals 16. This approaches the number of case studies involved in the study by Oba et al (2000) and far exceeds the number of most other collected cases in research papers.…”
Section: Progressmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The number of processes studied across all the organizations totals 16. This approaches the number of case studies involved in the study by Oba et al (2000) and far exceeds the number of most other collected cases in research papers.…”
Section: Progressmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Its aim is to quantify the contribution of WfM technology to improved business process performance with respect to lead time, wait time, service time, and utilization of resources. In this way, it is an extension of the scope of the study by Oba et al (2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…What is more, their focus is not on performance issues, but on aspects such as implementation (Parkes, 2002) or the appreciation of the technology by end-users (Kueng, 1998). The study most related to our research is that of Oba et al (2000), who developed a regression model on the basis of 20 cases to predict the reduction of lead time as a result of WfM implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Palmer 2007;Staffware 2000). In academic papers, various single case studies of workflow implementations are described and a small number of studies that involve multiple implementations (Herrmann and Hoffmann 2005;Kueng 2000;Oba et al 2000). Most of the studies that explicitly consider performance established a positive effect of workflow technology, in particular in Oba et al (2000).…”
Section: Workflow and Geographymentioning
confidence: 98%