2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.09.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the stabilization of isotropic pitch fibers for optimal tensile properties of carbon fibers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tensile specimens from the best conversion pathways in each experimental pitch system were tested as single filaments in sets of 10 ( 58 ). Fiber density values used for validation were determined via the commonly used buoyancy method ( 54 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tensile specimens from the best conversion pathways in each experimental pitch system were tested as single filaments in sets of 10 ( 58 ). Fiber density values used for validation were determined via the commonly used buoyancy method ( 54 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fibers were collected on a roll via a winder set to the maximum achievable speed in revolutions per minute where the fiber drawing remained stable for 5 min or more. Three-inch-long sectioned bundles of fibers were collected from the rolls, placed in a graphite crucible, and oxidized using optimized pathways for each sample established from previous studies (53)(54)(55)(56)(57). Oxidized fiber bundles were then transferred to a furnace and carbonized under streaming inert gas at a rate of 300°C/hour to a final temperature of 1200 to 1300°C.…”
Section: Experimental Cf Fabrication and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crosshead speed used for testing was 0.2 mm/min. According to the literature [46,47], as far as the orientation is concerned, it was not substantially modified after the tensile test, which was a promising indication for potential thermal treatment (stabilization, carbonization), because during these processes, the fibers tend to shrink and become thicker. Furthermore, these values are related and comply with the tensile properties of natural fiber composites [48], while the difference between the precursor fiber in tensile strength is ascribed to their slightly different microstructure, which is affected by extrusion speed, temperature, and residence time of the materials in the extrusion line and the size of the spinneret [49].…”
Section: Tensile Testing Of Precursor Fibersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the price of polyacrylonitrile (PAN), the most widely used precursor to produce high-performance carbon fibers, represents roughly half of the cost to produce PAN-based carbon fibers, while the other half is for subsequent conversion processes including stabilization, carbonization, and post-treatments . Hence, relatively low-cost resources like textile-grade PAN, , polyethylene, and pitch have been continuously explored to replace the current special-grade PAN to obtain cost-effective carbon fiber precursors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%