2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-017-2006-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and comparison of bioinformatic tools for the enrichment analysis of metabolomics data

Abstract: BackgroundBioinformatic tools for the enrichment of ‘omics’ datasets facilitate interpretation and understanding of data. To date few are suitable for metabolomics datasets. The main objective of this work is to give a critical overview, for the first time, of the performance of these tools. To that aim, datasets from metabolomic repositories were selected and enriched data were created. Both types of data were analysed with these tools and outputs were thoroughly examined.ResultsAn exploratory multivariate an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
161
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
161
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the reduced angular span and the difficulty of obtaining a high number of projections, our surface-constrained image reconstruction reduces significantly the streak artifacts derived from the low number of projections, similarly to previous proposals in the literature [ 23 – 25 ]. However, its main advantage over previous works is that the restriction on the search space by exploiting the surface-based support results in a complete recovery of the external contour of the sample and adjacent areas even for extremely reduced angular spans.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Regarding the reduced angular span and the difficulty of obtaining a high number of projections, our surface-constrained image reconstruction reduces significantly the streak artifacts derived from the low number of projections, similarly to previous proposals in the literature [ 23 – 25 ]. However, its main advantage over previous works is that the restriction on the search space by exploiting the surface-based support results in a complete recovery of the external contour of the sample and adjacent areas even for extremely reduced angular spans.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…A variable with a VIP score greater than 1 can be considered significant/important in the model. Analysis was done using R (v3.6.1) and Metaboanalyst's output [33]. Model statistics were quantified based on the fraction of the sum of squares for the selected component (R 2 ), which equates to the percentage of the model variance explained, and the predictive ability (Q 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the final output of Mashmap2 and Minimap2 are alignment boundaries and scores, whereas Nucmer4 outputs base-to-base alignments. Both alignment-free methods Mashmap2 and Minimap2 are able to map most of the query bases to unique positions in all datasets (shown later), therefore base-to-base alignments can be computed quickly for the final output using chaining heuristics and vectorization techniques ( Suzuki and Kasahara, 2018 ; Li, 2018 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%