2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2010.02853.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for the rapid detection of Vibrio harveyi in cultured marine shellfish

Abstract: Aims:  The purpose of this study was to establish a loop‐mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method for the rapid, sensitive detection of Vibrio harveyi in mariculture shellfish. Methods and Results:  A set of four primers, two outer and two inner primers, were designed from the toxR gene sequence of V. harveyi. The LAMP reaction was conducted at 65°C for 60 min. There were no cross‐reactions with other bacterial strains indicating a high specificity of the LAMP. The detection sensitivity of the LAMP assa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, the sensitivity of a monoplex LAMP assay, such as LAMP-LFD for V. harveyi detection in added shrimp samples (5 CFU per reaction: Thongkao et al 2015), conventional LAMP for V. harveyi in spiked shellfish cultures (17.2 CFU per reaction: Cao et al 2010), and V. cholera in added shrimp samples (20 CFU per reaction: Srisuk et al 2010) was greater than that of dLAMP-LFD in our study. The lower sensitivity may be due to competition among the number of primers that were used under multidetection conditions, as previously described (Ali and Reynolds 2000;Pang et al 2002;Xie et al 2006;Rashid et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…In most cases, the sensitivity of a monoplex LAMP assay, such as LAMP-LFD for V. harveyi detection in added shrimp samples (5 CFU per reaction: Thongkao et al 2015), conventional LAMP for V. harveyi in spiked shellfish cultures (17.2 CFU per reaction: Cao et al 2010), and V. cholera in added shrimp samples (20 CFU per reaction: Srisuk et al 2010) was greater than that of dLAMP-LFD in our study. The lower sensitivity may be due to competition among the number of primers that were used under multidetection conditions, as previously described (Ali and Reynolds 2000;Pang et al 2002;Xie et al 2006;Rashid et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…2010) and approx. 5–7 times higher than that of LAMP assay for Vibrio harveyi in added shellfish cultures (17·2 CFU per reaction; Cao et al. 2010) and V. cholerae in spiked shrimp sample (20 CFU per reaction; Srisuk et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, for V. harveyi-related species, highly similar genomes and genome plasticity may also limit precise identification by molecular techniques in some cases (Thompson and Swings, 2006;Sawabe et al, 2007). Thompson et al, 2007;Cano-Gomez et al, 2011), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) (Cao et al, 2010), and TaqMan PCR to detect potentially virulent strains for H. tuberculata (Schikorski et al, 2014) (Table 2).…”
Section: Harveyi Cladementioning
confidence: 99%