2017
DOI: 10.1121/1.4973954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a multiple scattering filter to enhance defect detection in heterogeneous media

Abstract: Ultrasonic evaluation of coarse-grain materials generates multiple scattering at high frequency and large depth. Recent academic experiments with array probes showed the ability of a random matrix method [multiple scattering filter (MSF)] to reduce multiple scattering, hence improving detection. Here, MSF is applied to an industrial nickel-based alloy with coarse-grain structure. Two samples with average grain sizes 90 ± 60 μm and 750 ± 400 μm are inspected with wide-band 64-element arrays at central frequenci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy between two estimations at the frequencies f > 3 MHz in the transition region z ≈ 15 mm is explained by the fact that the generalised image method is based on the averaged image properties. For the RRF sample the average single scattering intensity is always smaller (and, therefore, estimated multiple scattering rate is higher), compared to metric (18), where the maximum image amplitude is used. It needs to be stressed that the multiple scattering estimation method (10) is based entirely on the generalised image values outside of its main diagonal plane x T = x R , corresponding to the conventional 2D image.…”
Section: A Random Rod Forest Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discrepancy between two estimations at the frequencies f > 3 MHz in the transition region z ≈ 15 mm is explained by the fact that the generalised image method is based on the averaged image properties. For the RRF sample the average single scattering intensity is always smaller (and, therefore, estimated multiple scattering rate is higher), compared to metric (18), where the maximum image amplitude is used. It needs to be stressed that the multiple scattering estimation method (10) is based entirely on the generalised image values outside of its main diagonal plane x T = x R , corresponding to the conventional 2D image.…”
Section: A Random Rod Forest Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is based on the specific phase property of the single-scattering contribution to discriminate singlefrom multiple scattered waves. This so-called multiple scattering filter (MSF) can be used to improve detection in random scattering media [17], [18], or to characterise the weakly scattering medium (human soft tissue) [6]. This technique was also applied as a metric to compare experimental measurements and FE simulations [19], and to investigate the effect of microstructural elongation in titanium alloys [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a systematic and quantitative analysis of the singular value spectrum is needed in order to assess whether the first two singular values are indeed associated with coherent reflectors at the focal depth or if they are false alarms due to speckle fluctuations. To that aim, a probabilistic approach based on random matrix theory is developed in the next section in order to discriminate potential artifacts (Aubry & Derode, , ; Shahjahan et al, ).…”
Section: In‐depth Imaging Of Erebus Volcanomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After SVD processing, the defect signal is often distinguished from noise. This is due to the fact that the defect signal has a large energy share and corresponds to larger singular values, whereas noise corresponds to smaller singular values [23,24]. Zhang et al [25], in the detection of circular hole defects in noisy metallic materials, utilized high-order SVD to directly process FMC data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%